Author Archives: Kevin Hillman

About Kevin Hillman

Kevin Hillman works in television and is equally capable of discussing 19th century tax law and Pokemon battle tactics. He lives on Planet Coruscant with an Ewok named Moo.

captain-phillips-poster

Captain Phillips illustrates humanity on all sides

If you asked three people to tell the same story, chances are you would hear three different versions of the same event. Each would be tinted a different shade by the assumptions and preconceptions of the narrator.

The director of a movie based on real-life events is handicapped by those same storytelling challenges. By being on a worldwide stage, though, the director has a responsibility to expand the camera’s perspective beyond individual biases, to tell as complete a story as possible.

Captain Phillips is director Paul Greengrass’s recounting of the MV Maersk Alabama hijacking. Greengrass, with the help of extraordinary acting, deftly weaves a narrative from the viewpoint of the American crew of the freighter, while honoring the story of the Somali pirates who took over the ship, and he does it in a way that reminds us even the “bad guys” are the heroes of their own stories.

In April 2009, the Maersk Alabama was supposed to be on a simple business trip passing around the Horn of Africa. The vessel, which contained tons of valuable cargo, was targeted by a group of young Somali pirates. The story of what transpired was told from Captain Richard Phillips’s perspective in his 2010 book A Captain’s Duty, and was adapted for the silver screen by Billy Ray.

In the film, which is nominated for Best Picture at the 86th Academy Awards, Phillips is portrayed by Tom Hanks and is shown as a man prepared for this harrowing situation. Using experience acquired over 30 years, the captain does whatever is necessary to keep his crew safe from harm.

The inclination for American audiences is, of course, to root for the safe passage of the American crew. A lesser movie would demonize the pirates, stripping them of all humanity and denying the viewer any reason to empathize with their plight. Instead, the backstory and motives of the Somalis are brought to life by some excellent actors, new to Hollywood, and with incredible stories of their own.

Acting across from Hanks is Barkhad Abdi, playing the role of Muse. Muse is a young man who aspires for more than Somalia can offer. With the Maersk Alabama in the pirates’ possession, Muse stood to gain much. He believed he would be able to ransom the ship for enough money to allow him to move away to America and begin a new life.

Abdi brings much to the character of Muse. A Somali himself, Abdi left his native country at seven years old, eventually reaching the United States. His is an all-too-rare success story from that troubled nation, having now been nominated for an Academy Award in his first major film role.

Abdi rises to the unenviable task of holding his own on-screen with Hanks. Their characters engage in an intriguing game of chess. The captain offers Muse and his crew thousands of dollars in cash to leave the ship alone. Muse sees through the play, knowing that the a ship the size of the Maersk Alabama can yield a much higher payout, and counters by refusing the deal. Phillips sets a plan in motion that puts his side in control, but the Somalis soon trick the crew and take the captain hostage on a lifeboat.

As the U.S. Navy mobilizes to free Phillips, the captain continues to negotiate with his captors on the lifeboat. He learns much about his captors and even seems hopeful he can change their minds before any blood is shed. This is where the director and actors truly excel at giving voice to the pirates’ story.

No one is going to argue the virtues of piracy, even if Johnny Depp makes it look so drunkenly hilarious. But what Captain Phillips does so well is portray the pirates as men on a mission — and for them, it is a righteous mission. The movie shows that the pirates themselves were victims of the horrid situation in Somalia. One pirate in particular has been swept up in the tide of a hopeless life that has led him here, where his innocence and kindness lead him to the verge of forging a friendship with the American captain.

The problem with the cinematic successes of the movie up to this point is that it makes the viewer wish for a peaceful resolution. A part of me hoped to see the pirates make it home with their ransom, raising the standard of living of their native land and saving Somalia from the pits of post-colonial hell. Of course, that didn’t happen, and Somalia is still considered among the most failed states in the world.

That reality made the conclusion of the film difficult to watch. The United States was right, of course, to pursue the safe return of its citizens. But the juxtaposition of the overwhelming firepower of the U.S. Navy with the desperation of four men armed with guns brings into relief the imbalance of power and wealth across the globe. The outcome of the conflict also raises important questions about what constitutes a proportional response in such a situation.

Captain Phillips is a beautiful tale from the perspective of Phillips himself. Hanks’s acting ability alone elevates the movie into Best Picture territory. He portrays Phillips as a crafty sea veteran who was prepared to handle an impossible situation. At the end of the movie, Hanks gives another career-defining performance in a scene wrought with pain. Hanks, even without an Oscar nomination this time, again establishes why he is one of the great actors of all-time.

Phillips’s thoughts are also never far from his family, which is a poignant reminder of the flip side of the story. The movie is a tragedy for the four pirates involved. If you are like me, you may find yourself questioning the decisions of the U.S. Navy and lamenting the way the real-life events played out for the Somali men.

Ultimately, this is a film with a rich depth of perspective, challenging the viewer to consider his or her own unconscious biases. Captain Phillips artfully demonstrates the principle that both sides can simultaneously be fighting the good fight, even while employing tactics that may betray those principles.

alaska

Looking for Alaska, finding ourselves

I like to think I’m pretty cool. I like to think that, despite the Green Power Ranger keychain on my belt loop and the Pokémon poster on my apartment wall. However, there was a substantial portion of my life when I bore no such delusions. Reading John Green’s novels reminds me of a time when looking in the mirror only brought disgust and anger.

Between about third and eighth grades, I would constantly end up on the wrong side of jokes and putdowns. Unfortunately for my middle-school self, I was already a high school junior when Green’s Looking for Alaska was released. The novel tells a story both familiar and unique, reminding me of that time when I felt alone and of the journey that drove me to accept myself.

Looking for Alaska, Green’s first published novel, follows Miles Halter, a young man with quantifiable proof that he has no friends, as he enrolls at a boarding school to begin a new life. Halter, quickly dubbed “Pudge” by his roommate, tries to make new friends in a new school and searches for what he calls a “Great Perhaps.” Pudge’s friends are primarily his belligerent roommate, who is nicknamed “the Colonel,” and a seemingly free-spirited girl, who is actually named Alaska. Alaska, of course, quickly becomes the center of attention for Pudge as he tries to figure out this cute, mysterious girl.

Many readers will, like me, relate to Pudge. During those difficult tween years, jocks would call me chunky and laugh as I was one of the last to finish any run in phys ed. When my test would come back with an “A” marked on it, someone would inevitably call me a loser for having half a working brain in my head.

The people I considered my friends weren’t much better. Before the end of every school day, one of my best friends would steal books from my locker and toss them down three flights of stairs. Even my teachers were pretty disparaging. If I made a mistake, they would never give me the benefit of the doubt because they “expected better from me.” Perhaps something can be said for lower expectations.

Unfortunately, too many coming-of-age stories only offer struggling young readers unrealistic optimism. We expect Pudge will fall in love with the quirky Alaska. Of course she’s going to like him, too, despite that never being the way it happens in reality. Surprise, surprise. However, Green is not so predictable.

True to life, the story takes a series of wild turns, leading the reader to believe that a happy ending is on its way, only to stop us cold. Pudge and his friends have to face love, anger, and death, learn the difficulty of real relationships, and deal with the consequences of their decisions. It is a novel that reminds us that we don’t all face a single moment of clarity so much as several harsh moments that make us stronger.

Green’s novels are devoid of the melodrama so common at Degrassi High or on Dawson’s Creek (for you older folks). Instead, when a character trips into one of the genre’s inevitable pitfalls, someone always puts a firm stop to it. Oftentimes, these discussions about what is worth our tears and what is not are the best parts of the book, as we remember how we dealt with the difficult times we’ve faced in our own lives.

While it is certainly not an all around sad story, Looking for Alaska does make us consider a lot of things about what makes life as a teenager so difficult. All of the teen angst television shows and hopeless romance movies have stripped away any sense of reality when discussing teenage life. Green looks to portray those problems in a real and sympathetic way.

There is a certain tragedy and nihilism to a lot of Green’s work, and Looking for Alaska fits the category. Green does not move mountains to give a story a happy ending, nor does he take the independent cinema route of moving mountains to avoid a happy ending. Instead, Green lets his characters simply continue on with their lives, having been changed by the experience in a consequential way.

As Looking for Alaska draws to a close, the profound sense of sorrow in Pudge’s soul comes through the pages, but the reader will also feel that Pudge has become better for the journey. Pudge starts the book off looking to start anew in search of a “Great Perhaps.” Whether or not Pudge has truly found it, Miles Halter has undoubtedly learned that life is for living and enjoying, but that he also should be proud of who he is. Perhaps that is the most difficult thing for any of us to learn.

Looking for Alaska is the first of Green’s four solo novels. Before getting a copy of Alaska, I had read Green’s Paper Towns, which won the 2009 Edgar Award for best Young Adult novel, and The Fault in Our Stars. Both books were tremendous reads and hooked me on Green’s writing.

Sometimes it is easy to forget the difficult times I have had to struggle through and show no sympathy to those who are suffering through their own journeys. “Who cares if no one likes you? You just have to like yourself,” I’ll argue. Green’s novels are an antidote to that cynicism and exemplify the value of Young Adult fiction even to those outside their target demographic.

I hated going to school every single day until ninth grade. When I began high school, my life was changed considerably. New friends found me and old friends became tremendous people. I realized I didn’t need to be who the school bullies wanted me to be. I didn’t need to be who even my friends wanted me to be.

We all need to be ourselves and know that there are people out there who will like each of us for our quirks, whether they be that we like to speak in riddles or memorize the last words of historical figures. Looking for Alaska reminds us that we all need to love ourselves and let everyone important to us know we love them too.

Rumble-2014

‘Road to WrestleMania’ begins at Royal Rumble

After five months of terrible booking, we’ve finally reached that special time of year when WWE is bearable to watch. And perhaps no WWE show is more bearable than the Royal Rumble.

This year’s show is headlined by a WWE Super-Duper Extra Special Heavyweight Championship match between Randy “Bland White Guy” Orton and John “Bland White Guy” Cena in a “We Ran Out of Stipulations” match that’s sure to be as compelling as a Maven promo.

But we all know the real main event is the eponymous Royal Rumble match. Thirty wrestlers enter, only one can win. Unless it’s 1994.

This year’s Rumble match is expected to be an exciting one. Unlike previous years, there is no obvious winner, though there are some heavy favorites. So let’s take a look at the top contenders to win big this year, forecast where the win could take them, and argue what would be best for our entertainment.


Batista

Chances of Winning: Very High

Returning just in time for the Royal Rumble seems incredibly lucky, and definitely tilts the betting odds in The Animal’s favor. However, being announced ahead of time removes the virtual guarantee of victory that a surprise number 30 return holds.

Batista’s homecoming allows a plethora of interesting story lines going forward. Does The Animal take on the Beast, Brock Lesnar, at WrestleMania XXX? Or does Big Dave aim to be the new “face of the company,” either challenging Randy Orton, or turning heel and joining The Authority to replace The Viper? Any of these options allows for Batista to win the battle royal and move on to WrestleMania.

The most likely outcome from my perspective is a one-on-one dream match with Lesnar. Despite Lesnar’s claims to the number one contendership, I don’t think this match needs the WWE Championship on the line, and it would be stupid to take the belt away from a full-time star who has worked the entire year. Then again, The Rock was WWE Champion last year, so fairness is clearly not a factor in booking WrestleMania.

Equally as likely, in keeping with the unfair nature of WWE booking, would be Batista winning the Rumble and putting Orton away in the main event of WrestleMania, proving that WWE’s long-term booking plans were never about getting anyone new over.

My hope would be for The Animal to join The Authority, replacing Orton after his failure to defeat Cena, opening the door for a WrestleMania main event of D.B. vs D.B.: WWE Champion Batista vs Royal Rumble winner Daniel Bryan.

Possible WrestleMania Opponents: Brock Lesnar (most likely), Randy Orton, Daniel Bryan


Bray Wyatt

Chances of Winning: Lowest

Bray Wyatt is perhaps the largest outside shot in this list, but he could be the Franklin Pierce of the 2014 Rumble. (Franklin Pierce was never expected to be a presidential candidate, but he earned the Democratic nomination when the party could not agree on anyone else. He then proceeded to become the 14th President of the United States.) Wyatt, who models himself as this dimension’s Galactus, has certainly devoured the world of our expectations. It’s said that Wyatt is a personal favorite of Vince McMahon, which means good things for our friendly neighborhood cult leader.

Unfortunately for older fans, the most likely opponent for Wyatt in such a scenario is The Champ himself, John Cena. Cena vs. Wyatt could undoubtedly make for an entertaining story line heading into the Show of Shows, so this is another matchup that should not be about the WWE Championship. Bray’s creepy antics and violent tendencies would make for a great foil to pro wrestling’s Superman, and there’s no doubt the match could be an interesting watch.

This seems to be a pretty strong idea for a match at WrestleMania, but again, it doesn’t need a WWE Championship attached to it to make the match compelling.

Possible WrestleMania Opponents: John Cena, Daniel Bryan, the Shield


CM Punk

Chances of Winning: High

Even entering the Rumble match at number one, CM Punk has a higher chance than most to win, but it still seems unlikely. The Straight Edge Savior’s WrestleMania spot seems set in stone: a clash with Triple H for which the foundation is already being laid. However, if the last year is any indication, feuding with The Game does not mean you will ever actually wrestle him. Alternately, Punk could be building toward a one-on-one with Randy Orton in the main event.

Punk is long overdue for the final slot on the WrestleMania card. Shafted in that respect by WWE booking for two years in a row, the Second City Saint spent 434 days as WWE Champion without getting to defend his title in the final match of the Show of Shows. To put that in perspective, The Miz, King Kong Bundy, and Bam Bam Bigelow all closed out WrestleMania at some point in their careers.

Despite this obvious injustice, WWE appears intent on booking Triple H vs. CM Punk in what should be a very colorful feud — as long as Punk is allowed to let loose. This means Punk is likely to get knocked out of the Rumble match through less-than-clean circumstances. That will allow him to move forward with the anti-authority story line that promises to birth some very good promos, at least from Punk (with Triple H only pretending he’s on the Best in the World’s level).

In the best possible scenario, CM Punk wins the WWE title in the Elimination Chamber and faces Daniel Bryan in the single greatest WrestleMania main event ever. That, however, is the craziest of dreams.

Possible WrestleMania Opponents: Triple H, Randy Orton


Roman Reigns

Chances of Winning: Low

Another outside shot whose chances in the Rumble are dependent on Vince McMahon’s whims. Remember in the early days of the ECW “brand” when Paul Heyman wanted to build his show around CM Punk, and Vince said: No, the future is in Bobby Lashley? Clearly, Vince knows his stuff. Anyway, Lashley was nowhere near ready, while Punk was already blazing trails and getting over based on in-ring performance alone. So, as expected, Vince went with the bland meathead.

Roman Reigns is no Lashley. Reigns is great. Reigns has potential. Roman Reigns, however, is perhaps the third most talented guy in The Shield. Being the third best in The Shield still makes you better than 90 percent of professional wrestlers, but it shouldn’t warrant a rushed push. Still, that’s obviously the direction WWE is deciding to go, leaving Rollins and Ambrose to either find a new partner or end the hottest gimmick WWE has introduced in a decade.

Rumor is that Roman Reigns’s push is expected to see him plow through the roster in the Royal Rumble. While the Diesel push could be fun to watch, he certainly shouldn’t win the match. The money match for The Shield is either in a six-man tag against the Wyatt’s (remember that pop when they got into a scrape?) or a triple threat among his fellow soon-to-be-former members of The Shield.

If Reigns does shock the world and win the match, his opponent at the big show should definitely be Randy Orton. A win at the Rumble would propel Reigns into stardom and certainly give him some solid babyface support. That kind of popularity, however, would be no match for John Cena’s, who only gets booed out of the building when he is facing much cooler wrestlers than Reigns — guys like Edge, Rob Van Dam, CM Punk, and Daniel Bryan.

Possible WrestleMania Opponents: Seth Rollins and Dean Ambrose, Randy Orton, John Cena, the Wyatt’s


Brock Lesnar

Chances of Winning: Low

As of now, the Beast isn’t even an entrant in the Royal Rumble, but that could simply be a swerve. Brock Lesnar as a surprise number 30 would blow the roof off the building, and the likely confrontation with Batista would immediately ignite a WrestleMania feud. Lesnar could eliminate The Animal and win the Rumble, with Batista taking the belt in the Chamber, setting up the epic clash of big men on the Grandest Stage of Them All.

Lesnar has long been rumored to be The Undertaker’s opponent for this installment of The Streak, but that seems to be losing favor with the fear that his rough style could hurt the aging Phenom. Another option for Lesnar at WrestleMania would be for him to win the title at Elimination Chamber, becoming The Authority’s new champion and a seemingly unbeatable force, to be conquered at WrestleMania by either his 2013 SummerSlam opponent, CM Punk, or the people’s choice, Daniel Bryan, either of which promises to be an awesome match.

The best decision may simply be to leave the Beast out of the Rumble match and book him against Batista (see above). Their clash should be about who is better and stronger, not about a championship that neither has held in years. And if Lesnar isn’t going to win, he shouldn’t be anywhere near the Rumble match.

Possible WrestleMania Opponents: Batista, The Undertaker, Daniel Bryan


Daniel Bryan

Chances of Winning: High

It’s very rare that the sentimental favorite for the Royal Rumble is considered an unlikely victor for the match. I list Bryan as highly likely to win because of the grassroots support for the man, and because it would be the best next step in Bryan Danielson’s long journey to being a legitimate WWE Champion. Despite this, WWE’s booking of Bryan has clearly been terrible, and it seems unlikely Vince is going to trust the man with the WrestleMania main event, despite his overwhelming popularity.

We all want Daniel Bryan to win this match. Even though I am a CM Punk fan first, I want Bryan to win the WWE Championship at WrestleMania. There is no better possible conclusion to the terrible Authority story line than Punk defeating Triple H, and Bryan finally obtaining the WWE Championship (again).

Unfortunately, the question of who his WrestleMania opponent would be is very tricky. WWE can’t possibly sell Orton vs. Bryan as the main event of another pay-per-view (is that word anachronistic now?), and while John Cena vs. Daniel Bryan II would be huge, it’s doubtful that anyone in WWE would allow Bryan to beat Cena twice. No one gets that kind of honor. Cena vs. Bryan also lacks the payoff for the god-awful Authority story line, unless — and this is highly unlikely and ill-advised — Cena turns heel and joins the McMahons.

Recent rumors have indicated Bryan is a possible challenger to The Streak this year. The chances of that pairing almost make all of the terrible booking of the past year acceptable. Is there any other man in or out of WWE who would give The Deadman such a good match? And with his never-say-die character, Bryan could get an amazing rub and look unbelievable in his inevitable defeat.

Daniel Bryan manages to be simultaneously the best choice and the least likely to win the Rumble match, which makes judging his odds difficult. I stand by my ranking of Bryan as highly likely to win, despite my better judgment saying it won’t happen.

Possible WrestleMania Opponents: The Undertaker, Randy Orton, John Cena, Batista, Brock Lesnar, Bray Wyatt


The Odds

Superstar
Odds
Batista
2:1
Daniel Bryan
3:1
CM Punk
5:1
Roman Reigns
10:1
Brock Lesnar
15:1
Bray Wyatt
25:1

 

Ultimately, Batista is the odds-on favorite to win the Rumble match. However, Daniel Bryan has forged an amazing connection with fans around the world who want to see him succeed more than anything. The question is whether or not Vince McMahon is willing to accept this fact and give the people what they want. Knowing the McMahon track record, this seems highly unlikely, but we can always hope.

After all, WWE thrives on hope. We hope for our heroes to vanquish the dragons and defeat their own demons. We hope the hard worker will get his time in the sun. We hope Triple H won’t cut a 30-minute promo, running down the entire roster. And we hope to see John Cena win against the monsters like Khali and lose to the workers like Bryan and Punk. We hope. And, every once in a while, WWE lets us believe.

Let’s hope Sunday, January 26, is one of those times.

12-years-a-slave

12 Years a Slave stresses Gettysburg’s significance

November 19, 2013, was the 150th anniversary of President Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address. That date was celebrated across the nation as an interesting piece of trivia, but it is critical to understand that the Address and the liberties won in the Civil War are only 150 years old.

To put that span of time into perspective, railroads are older than the Thirteenth Amendment’s guarantees of freedom, and the last child of a slave only died in 2011. American slavery is, unfortunately, a piece of our very recent history. The film 12 Years a Slave, nominated for the Academy Award for Best Picture, skillfully displays the horror of a world that was transformed by the events of the 1860s.

Lincoln’s address at Gettysburg was a defining moment in the American story that is difficult to truly comprehend without context. When the war broke out, North and South believed themselves divided over a simple political dispute: who was sovereign under the U.S. Constitution, the states or the federal government? There was a certain inauthenticity in this understanding, as the South was only fighting for states’ rights to protect their “peculiar institution,” also known as human slavery.

It was not until Lincoln gave his address at Gettysburg that both sides, especially the North, acknowledged the war was not simply a political dispute, but a moral one. To the president, this was a war about ending a great evil. While history has immortalized his words, many at the time questioned the president’s actions. Some, indeed, were wondering what took him so long.

The slavery question had been creating more and more heated disputes among the American people in the decades since the ratification of the Constitution. Many in the North saw the war from the beginning as a crusade against the great slave power. Some came from the Quaker traditions of Pennsylvania, which had filed the first anti-slavery petition to the U.S. Congress in its very first session. Many, however, were recent converts.

The printing of two seminal works of literature in the 1850s sparked a rise in abolitionist sentiment. The more commonly known work is Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin, but the other work, seemingly forgotten by history, was Solomon Northup’s Twelve Years a Slave.

Twelve Years tells the story of Northup, a free-born African-American from New York who was tricked into a trip to Washington, D.C., where he was drugged and kidnapped. After 160 years of relative obscurity, Solomon’s tale has made it to the big screen, and in a big way.

Chiwetel Ejiofor, a British actor, takes us through the difficult journey from free man with a wonderful family to human livestock, letting the true tragedy of his life sink in deeply with each scene. Solomon is given the slave name “Platt” and is sold to Ford, played by the always fantastic Benedict Cumberbatch.

Cumberbatch plays a straightforward yet challenging character. A product of his time, Ford is a slave owner, but not necessarily a tyrant. Ford finds himself impressed by Solomon and often treats him like a friend, while still keeping the line between master and slave clear. It becomes difficult at times to tell if Cumberbatch’s character is truly a good man or is simply manipulating his slaves to get the best work out of them.

After a dispute, Solomon is sold to a notorious slave-breaker by the name of Epps, played by Michael Fassbender. Those familiar with Fassbender’s work probably know what to expect. His portrayal of Magneto in X-Men: First Class allowed for a lot of moral ambiguity in his actions, but Epps is no such complex character. I believe some men are simply evil, and Fassbender convinces the viewer Epps is nothing short of a monster.

This section of the movie is the toughest to watch, and it certainly lives up to the brutal reputation of slavery in the American South. You may find yourself hoping for the movie to end so you can move on to think happier thoughts, but I believe these scenes are what elevate the movie beyond entertainment or even art; sitting through these uncomfortable scenes will strengthen the character of any viewer.

Steve McQueen’s adaptation of Twelve Years a Slave is a difficult work of modern cinema that displays in stark and real terms the tragedy of chattel slavery. It reminds us that seven score and 10 years later, we still owe a debt to our shackled ancestors, whether we descend from slaves or not. These men and women were viewed as subhuman even as they toiled to build the country of freedom we enjoy today. We owe it to the human beings who worked by the force of the whip: to remember their tragedies and to tell their stories.

McQueen (the director, not the late “King of Cool”) proves himself unafraid to turn a mirror on the United States and remind us all why the dead at Gettysburg did not die in vain. His deft work emphasizes to us that the Gettysburg Address and the Emancipation Proclamation are not simply words on a paper to memorize for a school assignment. They are philosophical tracts that changed the history of America and the world.

The Gettysburg Address changed the reasons for fighting the Civil War. Instead of dying for ideological differences about nationalism and states’ rights, the thousands of men who gave their lives at Gettysburg died for a greater ideal. Those brave soldiers sacrificed themselves so that America could have a new birth of freedom — so that millions of men and women still unborn could live free.

Lincoln believed the American people would not long remember what he said in Gettysburg. But true art — art with a purpose — always survives the centuries. We may not be watching McQueen’s masterpiece in 150 years, but the work done by Ejiofor, Fassbender, and Cumberbatch will keep the story of Solomon Northup alive in the American conscience for at least another generation.

wonder-woman

Wonder Woman deserves her own movie

What’s the difference between Wonder Woman and Katniss Everdeen?

Katniss has her own movie. Wonder Woman, despite her status as a leading comic book character for seven decades, does not. In fact, Warner Brothers announced that the illustrious heroine’s first appearance on the big screen will be as a minor character in a movie starring two male superheroes.

Iconic female characters are hard to find in American culture. While most people would have no trouble recognizing Superman, Batman, or Darth Vader, they would have a much harder time naming a female character of equal notoriety.

Wonder Woman, whose roots date back to World War II, is perhaps the only significant female character who appeals to a mass audience. Diana Prince, the warrior princess of the mythological Greek island of Themyscira, is both a feminist icon, representing empowerment and womanly strength, and a sex symbol, wearing skimpy clothes as she vanquishes evil. Very few characters – and even fewer female ones – enjoy the stature of Wonder Woman. So why has Princess Diana been unable to find her way to the silver screen?

Historically, it has been difficult to get comic book heroes onto the big screen. However, following the success of the X-Men and SpiderMan movies in the 00?s, studios came to rely on superhero properties to prop up the industry in the face of a decreasing home video market. The rise of the superhero in Hollywood led many to assume that all of DC Comics’s hottest properties would make their way to the silver screen. Yet, after several attempts including one by future Avengers helmsman Joss Whedon, Wonder Woman has never been able to make the jump.

Hollywood is known to abide by old theories about who pays for movie tickets. Despite women making up a full 50 percent of the movie-going audience, females comprise only 28 percent of speaking roles in major motion pictures, according to a study by the Annenberg School at the University of Southern California.

Studio executives cite previous failures such as Elektra and Catwoman as proof that a female lead can’t sell tickets, ignoring the fact that those movies were unpopular for their content and not the lack of a male lead. Even accepting that the failure of those movies can be attributed to a lack of interest in the characters, neither Catwoman nor Elektra shares the status of the princess of Themyscira.

Falling in line with that outdated mindset, Warner Brothers recently announced the casting of Gal Gadot of Fast and Furious fame in the role of Diana Prince for the upcoming Batman vs. Superman movie. While the title is only tentative, it is telling that the use of Batman in the Man of Steel sequel was met with great fanfare and widespread Internet reaction, while Wonder Woman was mentioned months later as a simple casting choice. Is Wonder Woman any less iconic than DC’s other “big two” heroes? Even if that is true, there is no stronger female character to portray on the big screen than Wonder Woman.

Superhero movies, just like the comic books they are based on, are consistently targeted to men. Nonetheless, Wonder Woman comics have sold well enough to survive for over 60 years. The market clearly exists, and casting a beautiful woman to portray Princess Diana would hardly hurt studios’ efforts to syphon away the cash of any fan of the female form. It is naive to believe that a Wonder Woman movie wouldn’t be seen by millions.

Despite Warner Brothers’ fears, the overwhelming success of The Hunger Games, both in print and on screen, has shown that a strong female hero can not only sell tickets in today’s world, but also create a cultural phenomenon. Katniss Everdeen is a new character, only existing in the public consciousness for a few years, making the original Hunger Games movie a bigger box office gamble than Wonder Woman could ever be.

The second installment in the series, Catching Fire, was the highest grossing film domestically in 2013, surpassing even the male-led Iron Man 3. Katniss Everdeen and The Hunger Games franchise have shown that a character who is both strong and compassionate has great crossover appeal, not only drawing teenage girls to the theaters, but men and women of all ages, including the male audience of comic book adaptations.

Admittedly, Wonder Woman is a difficult character to adapt. Her background in Greek mythology makes a reality-based movie á la the Dark Knight trilogy essentially impossible. Still, as Marvel’s Thor has proven, the world of myth can be fused with the gritty realism of the modern action flick to create an even more compelling spectacle. Remember during The Avengers when the multiple worlds of the superheroes collided to create something greater than its cinematic parts? With the mythological stature of Themyscira meeting the gritty, crime-infested world of Gotham City, Warner Brothers has a great opportunity to create something equally special.

Wonder Woman has certainly had her ups and downs over the decades, including an ill-advised run in the comics as a depowered Kung Fu master. Still, Wonder Woman was one of the very few comic book characters to break out of her original medium when Lynda Carter played the character on a successful television show in the late 1970s. Unfortunately, this success has never been matched, and a recent attempt at bringing the character back to the small screen has been scuttled in favor of a new show for The Flash. CW president Mark Pedowitz recently confirmed this travesty, reasoning, “These are iconic characters … You only get one shot.”

This leaves Gadot’s interpretation as the only Wonder Woman we can expect on any screen for some time. The tentatively titled Batman vs. Superman movie hits theaters in May 2016.

With Catching Fire continuing to prove old theories wrong, Warner Brothers is missing a golden opportunity to break with tradition and make millions with a strong woman. The long-term track record of female-led films has been lackluster, but the tide appears to be turning. In addition to The Hunger Games, the female-led Twilight Saga is among the top 10 most successful movie franchises of all time, making as much money as male-centric properties Spider-Man and Pirates of the Caribbean.

An iconic character of American culture, Wonder Woman’s first foray onto the silver screen should not be in a throwaway scene in a movie about two other, very strong, characters. Women make up a much larger portion of the movie viewing audience than Warner Brothers is willing to accept, and Wonder Woman, like Katniss Everdeen, is a character with strong crossover appeal who should be respected.

Wonder Woman deserves her own movie.