Category Archives: tv

heroes

Heroes? Seven shows more deserving of revival

We are fortunate to live in a world where cancellation doesn’t always mean the end of our favorite television shows. Series like Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Angel live on in comic book form. A year ago, Rob Thomas launched a record-breaking Kickstarter campaign for a Veronica Mars film, which will be in theaters March 14, nearly a year to the day after that historic Kickstarter launch. Fans of the Fox program 24 were delighted to hear the show would be back for a limited run this spring, four years after it ended. There are even rumors swirling around the Internet about the cult hit Farscape getting a film, possibly sooner rather than later.

Jumping on the series revival bandwagon, NBC announced last weekend they would be bringing back their sci-fi drama Heroes for a limited 13-episode run sometime in 2015. The concept of Heroes — ordinary people suddenly discovering they have superhuman powers — was interesting, and the first season of the show was excellent. The first season episode “Company Man” still stands out in my memory as a brilliant hour of television. However, season two came along with new characters that changed the entire show. Then the 2007-08 writers’ strike happened, and everything just went downhill from there. I stayed with the show until its disappointing season four finale and was grateful NBC cancelled the show, thus making the decision for me whether or not to watch season five.

All of this makes NBC’s decision to bring back Heroes a little perplexing. Why would they decide to bring this show back now, especially after it ended at such a low point, and having already alienated most of its fanbase? It makes sense for Fox to bring back 24, a show fans still love, but why Heroes? Why not a show fans would actually like to see again, like The West Wing?

Of course, there are logistical and financial hurdles, but we can dream, can’t we? It got me to thinking: What other shows would I like to see come back, even if just for a limited run of 13 episodes?

Alphas (SyFy)

If NBCUniversal really wanted to bring back a show about people with superhuman abilities, why not turn to one of their other properties and give Alphas a real conclusion? This is a show that fans actually want to see return and receive a proper send-off, tying up all the loose ends left by the second season finale. I feel like the show was just finding its footing and then ended with a cliffhanger that will never be resolved; and there’s nothing more frustrating than an unresolved cliffhanger. At the very least, they could give us a movie to wrap up the series.

Pushing Daisies (ABC)

While Pushing Daisies writers at least had enough warning of cancellation to give viewers some closure, it still felt rushed and was disappointing to say goodbye to this show. I loved the quirkiness, the vibrant color palette of the sets and costumes, and the wonderful cast. The show was a critical darling and received decent ratings early in its first season, then became a victim of the writers’ strike. ABC opted not to bring the show back after the strike, instead waiting until fall to debut season two. By then, 10 months had passed and the show lost a lot of viewers. It wasn’t even given a full 22-episode second season, only airing 13 episodes. A comic series was in the works through DC Comics imprint WildStorm; however, DC shut down WildStorm before the comic was ever printed. There’s been talk of a Pushing Daisies revival — especially after rumors surfaced about series creator Bryan Fuller discussing the ins and outs of a Kickstarter campaign with Thomas after the Veronica Mars launch — but nothing has been confirmed.

Twin Peaks (ABC)

Twin Peaks is another well-loved series full of quirky characters that was cancelled too soon. While a prequel film was produced after the series’ cancellation, what fans really want to know is what happens to Kyle MacLachlan’s Special Agent Dale Cooper after the cliffhanger in the second season finale. The show itself has become a staple of pop culture, with references still being made in current television shows: the USA series Psych even did a tribute episode a few years ago, titled “Dual Spires,” which featured several original cast members. David Lynch’s style is unique and difficult to pin down to a certain genre, and it would be a welcome change from all the reality television and formulaic crime dramas currently on television. The year 2015 would also be the perfect time to bring the series back, as it would mark 25 years since the show’s original premiere.

The Pretender (NBC)

Does anyone else still wonder whatever became of Jarod? NBC cancelled The Pretender after four seasons, and then TNT aired two made-for-TV movies that still didn’t answer all the questions fans had. If anything, they just brought up more questions. I’m definitely more interested in learning what’s been happening with Jarod and whether the Centre is still in business than I am in meeting new Heroes. Besides, Michael T. Weiss hasn’t been too busy lately, and I’m sure Andrea Parker could take a break from Pretty Little Liars long enough to create at least a couple more movies, if not a miniseries.

Moonlight (CBS)

Moonlight was a show that premiered early in the vampire craze — perhaps too early. It premiered on CBS a year before HBO introduced us to Vampire Bill and Sookie on True Blood and Twilight opened at the box office. The show, starring a then-relatively-unknown Alex O’Loughlin and Veronica Mars’ Jason Dohring as modern vampires who could walk in daylight, also suffered from the writers’ strike as its first season was shortened to just 16 episodes and CBS opted not to renew it for a second season. While the series finale didn’t entirely leave fans hanging, there were still a few loose ends that could be used to create a miniseries based on the show. Sure, O’Loughlin is currently starring in Hawaii Five-O, but who wouldn’t rather see him return to being broody vampire Mick St. James? Plus, Dohring and Sophia Myles don’t seem to be too overwhelmed with work these days.

Freaks and Geeks (NBC)

Another show on a lot of “Cancelled Too Soon” lists is NBC’s Freaks and Geeks, which first aired back in 1999. The show was cancelled after 12 episodes, and fans had to rally to get the three of remaining completed episodes aired. The final three didn’t air on television until Fox Family Channel aired the show in 2000. Like many good shows canceled too soon, Freaks and Geeks has developed a devoted cult following in the years since it originally aired. Most of the cast, which included James Franco, John Francis Daley, Linda Cardellini, Seth Rogen, and Jason Segel, has become much more recognizable since then, but surely a short miniseries or two-hour movie wouldn’t be out of the question. Let’s see what Lindsay’s (Cardellini) high school reunion is like, because we all know those can be just as awkward as high school itself.

Firefly (Fox)

While Firefly has had more life since its cancellation than most shows — in truth, it will never truly die — I just felt this list wouldn’t be complete without including one of fandom’s most unjustly canceled series. Fox essentially self-destructed this series from the beginning, by opting not to air the original pilot episode first. Viewers were a little confused by the order of the episodes, but that didn’t prevent fans from instantly falling in love with the show. Despite only having one season of 14 episodes, some of which never even aired during its initial run, the series maintains an extremely loyal fanbase that only grows as more and more people are introduced to the show. Since cancellation, the series has lived on in several comic series as well as the major motion picture, Serenity, which finally answered many of the questions surrounding the character of River. In 2012, fans at Comic-Con were able to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the series with the cast as well as creator Joss Whedon. While most of the cast has been busy these last few years, and Whedon is spending most of his time with some small project about superheroes calling themselves Avengers, I’m sure if given the chance they would all love to bring these characters back to life again.

These are just a few shows deserving a second chance that I came up with. Feel free to add your own in the comments below.

aj-lee

Wrestling network chance for Divas to make moolah

In this week’s edition of “A Feminist Sensibility,” we are talking about the world of professional wrestling. During the course of this article, I focus on WWE, largely because it is the brand I am most familiar with and also has the largest female roster in the world of professional wrestling.

First, a little bit of back story. My husband, brother-in-law, and many of their friends are huge WWE fans. When my husband, near the beginning of our relationship, revealed he was a WWE fan, I was astonished. I hadn’t realized that: 1) professional wrestling was still televised, and 2) grown men were fans.

Through the beginning of our relationship, I would watch the “longest running, weekly episodic show on television” in an effort to be the “cool” girlfriend. Soon after that, I was invited to a Royal Rumble pay-per-view viewing party. I was extremely overwhelmed and completely unable to contribute to conversations. I spent most of the night asking, “Who is the one in the purple underwear again?”

Fast-forward four years and I still do not consider myself a “WWE fan,” but I can at least hold a conversation about the participants and tell you who I like and dislike.

Last month, WWE once again held its annual Royal Rumble event. For my husband’s family, this is an occasion marked with pizza, celebration, games, and even prizes. I usually attend this event and lament that my favorite wrestler, Evan “Air” Bourne is nowhere to be found these days.

As I watched this year’s Royal Rumble, I was struck by the lack of female characters. Throughout the pay-per-view, the only women were an announcer and an occasional clip showcasing Stephanie McMahon, the daughter of Vince McMahon, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of WWE. Even during weekly episodes of Raw, the Divas matches are usually short, uninspired, and contain stereotypical female plot lines.

As a feminist, I’m hugely enamored with the concept of female wrestling. It should be a place where women are able to buck the traditional concepts of gender, focus on building muscle mass alongside the guys, and just wrestle. Unfortunately, the practice of female wrestling, at least in the realm of WWE, turns into a beauty contest and not an athletic event. I’m not saying a woman can’t be both beautiful and strong, because I absolutely think she can. What I am saying is that WWE seems to be more worried about the hair, makeup, and breast implants of their Divas more than actually fostering any wrestling talent they may have.

Furthermore, young female wrestlers who show talent and aptitude in the ring are often forced to take it down a notch for mass appeal. When the wrestler A.J. Lee debuted, I was extremely excited because I liked her and her persona of a nerdy, quirky, non-traditional ass-kicker. She had the potential to join the ranks of other female trailblazers in the industry, including The Fabulous Moolah and the recently departed Mae Young.

True to form for WWE, though, A.J.’s story line quickly spiraled downhill until she was just an accessory to the guys’ action. She was messing with all the male Superstars’ heads, was nearly married off, and was deemed “crazy.” I was no longer excited to see her on the screen and, in my mind, she was downgraded as “just another pretty face.”

As an aside, since I know someone will bring it up if I don’t, let’s talk about the Divas’ skimpy outfits for just a moment. Let me be clear: I have zero problems with the outfits the Divas wear in the ring. This is one instance where I think the men and women are truly equal. The men wear outfits that are just as revealing, and at this point, it’s not about objectification of the body, but more about showing the athleticism of those in the ring. So an occasional boob pops out, but there’s no difference between the guys who ogle Summer Rae and me hoping that I get a glimpse of Christian’s tush.

It is easy to blame the lackluster Divas division on the man at the top of the company. Perhaps the lack of creativity isn’t entirely Vince McMahon’s fault, though. It may just be a reflection of wrestling fans at-large, and that is the conversation we need to be having to change the dynamics.

During the Royal Rumble main event last month, the “WWE Universe” was extremely upset that Daniel Bryan was not a participant in the 30-man battle royal. At the reveal of the final Rumble entrant, the mostly male crowd started chanting, “We want Divas!” The chant was an insult aimed at the organizers and writers. The implication: the inevitability of Batista winning the match was so bad that even watching Divas wrestle would have been a more appealing option.

As a woman watching the Royal Rumble, I was insulted by the “We want Divas” chant. You are damn right I wanted Divas, but not because I was unsatisfied by the Royal Rumble match, but because when I’m watching WWE, I’d like to see something I can relate to (and no, Total Divas is not the answer). I understand WWE has to be extremely careful about putting men and women in the ring together. I’m absolutely certain the last thing McMahon wants to see on-screen in the contemporary, PG-rated version of WWE is a male wrestler beating up a female wrestler, creating a visual representation of domestic violence. But that isn’t to say the current path of WWE is “female friendly.”

If there is one thing I can give McMahon credit for, it is his ability to see how things can change in the future. One of the reasons WWE has been so successful as a company is largely due to McMahon’s ability to see the potential of a nationwide cable television audience before anyone else. What’s more is he’s proving his business savvy once again with the creation of the WWE Network, which debuted yesterday.

I believe McMahon and company have a chance to change my mind and possibly even turn me into a “fan.” With the new network, WWE has a unique opportunity to expand and experiment with what would attract (and keep) a feminist audience. As a first step, I would suggest WWE actually try to employ a female writer (or two, but let’s not get too radical) for the network, since there aren’t any in the company as of now.

I also believe there are men out there who would enjoy a more robust Divas division. I believe this because I watch wrestling with some of these men, and these men send money to McMahon on a regular basis. This is why, even if McMahon doesn’t share my Feminist Sensibility, I hold out hope that he will see the error of his ways when it comes to the Divas and will work with some female creative writers to make the Divas division the best thing it possibly can be — and make some money while he’s at it.

So Mr. McMahon, if you are reading this, please give me a call. I’d love to be the first female creative writer for you, and I’ve got a lot of great ideas on how to make the Divas brand soar.

godot

Fandom on stage: The wheel is come full circle

When people think of hardcore fan*s, they often picture stereotypes like the guys of The Big Bang Theory hanging out in the comic book store, or of the legions of fan*s and cosplayers at Comic-Con. Rarely is the first thing on someone’s mind when fanning is mentioned going to be Shakespeare or theater.

However, believe it or not, some of the biggest celebrities that fan*s have fallen in love with also perform Shakespeare on stage in live theater. Fan*s can dress up as the Doctor at Comic-Con and also enjoy Shakespeare; the two aren’t mutually exclusive. And sometimes, those interests even overlap.

Recently, Tom Hiddleston, whom most fan*s recognize as Loki from the Marvel Cinematic Universe, starred in a stage production of Shakespeare’s Coriolanus produced by National Theatre Live in London. While most Americans weren’t able to travel to see the live production at the Donmar Warehouse in England, National Theatre Live records its plays and broadcasts them in certain theaters around the globe. It’s an excellent way to see brilliant British theatre productions when you’re stuck stateside, like me.

This production of Coriolanus was fantastic. Even Hiddleston fan*s have to admit he was just one of the many terrific things about this play. The production made superb use of a black box space, using just a simple square stage with no scenery or backdrop aside from the cement wall of the warehouse behind them. Coriolanus is a fairly raw play to begin with, and stripping it down to, for the most part, just the actors on the stage really focused attention on the performances, which were all brilliant.

Aside from Hiddleston, fan*s may also recognize Mark Gatiss, co-creator and star of Sherlock, as well as Alfie Enoch, better known as Dean Thomas from the Harry Potter movies.

Another production that National Theatre Live broadcasts in the States almost every year is a fascinating staging of Frankenstein directed by Danny Boyle, known for Slumdog Millionaire and more. This production stars two Sherlocks, each taking turns with the two lead roles. One night, Benedict Cumberbatch will play Dr. Frankenstein while Jonny Lee Miller plays the Creature, and the next night they switch roles. I’ve seen the version with Cumberbatch playing the Creature and it was incredible. If, for any reason, anyone still doubts Cumberbatch’s acting abilities, they need only watch this production to have that doubt erased.

If you’re a fan* as well as a Broadway lover, there have been many opportunities for your interests to overlap recently. Doctor Who fan favorite Arthur Darvill was starring in Once for several months, which I’m sure was enjoyable if you had a chance to see it. Also, at the beginning of January, Chuck’s Zachary Levi finished up a run with the musical First Date, which was wonderful, according to reviews. Emmy-winner Jim Parsons also made his Broadway debut in the 2011 production of The Normal Heart, which is being adapted as a television movie this year.

I can’t mention Broadway productions without bringing up one of the best friendships in the business: Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellan, who are starring in repertory productions of No Man’s Land and Waiting for Godot that have gotten rave reviews. And if you follow either of these gentlemen on Twitter, you know just how awesome they really are. As an added bonus, these productions also star Billy Crudup, who may be more recognizable to some fans as Watchmen’s Dr. Manhattan.

McKellan and Stewart are also both accomplished Shakespearean actors. Recently, Stewart played a small role in the BBC’s The Hollow Crown, a miniseries adapting the second of the Bard’s historical tetralogies: Richard II; Henry IV, Part 1; Henry IV, Part 2, and Henry V. Stewart played John of Gaunt in Richard II. He has also played Claudius on stage and on film in the Royal Shakespeare Company’s Hamlet, which starred another fan* favorite, David Tennant.

Tennant is probably most famous for his role as the 10th Doctor on the long-running British sci-fi series Doctor Who. He also played Barty Crouch Jr. in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. Recently, he has taken on a variety of roles, including starring in several stage productions of Shakespeare’s works. In just the last few years, he has appeared as Hamlet, Benedek in Much Ado About Nothing (alongside former Doctor Who companion Catherine Tate), and Richard II in the Royal Shakespeare Company production.

Speaking of Shakespeare, I’d be remiss if I didn’t include possibly the ultimate crossover between fandom and Shakespeare: Joss Whedon’s Much Ado About Nothing. The movie was filmed during a break in filming The Avengers and stars many of the actors fan*s have come to know and love from Whedon’s other beloved series. The entire film was shot at Whedon’s own home in black and white and is one of my favorite film adaptations of Shakespeare ever.

The best parts of the film are all the subtle (and sometimes not-so-subtle) actions and expressions of the characters in the background. The film flows with a relaxed pace and it’s easy to feel the chemistry and friendship between the actors. This was a project most of them did for fun because they enjoyed working together, and I think some of that comes through in the finished product. If you’re a fan* as well as a Shakespeare lover, I cannot recommend this film highly enough.

And finally, we’ve come full circle. Aside from Hiddleston’s recent stage performance of Coriolanus, he also starred as Prince Hal, the man who becomes Henry V, in the The Hollow Crown. The series aired in the United Kingdom shortly before the Summer Olympics in 2012, and in the United States back in September. It can now be purchased on DVD, and each play is a fairly faithful adaptation of Shakespeare’s work. They are beautifully filmed and the cast is magnificent: aside from Hiddleston and Stewart, you also have Jeremy Irons, Ben Whishaw, Michelle Dockery, Joe Armstrong, Simon Russell Beale, and many others, all of whom are amazing.

This is just an overview of a few of the theatre works some of our favorite celebrities have done in the last few years. If you know of something I missed, feel free to share it in the comments so we can all experience it! One of my favorite parts of being a fan* is introducing people to new things; you wouldn’t believe how many Supernatural and Doctor Who converts I’ve made over the years.

Like I said last week, we now live in a time where it’s cooler to be a fan* than it used to be, so let’s take advantage of that and show everyone just how cool we can be. We can fan out over the new Guardians of the Galaxy trailer or Benedict Cumberbatch on Sesame Street and still enjoy things like Shakespeare and wine.

To be or not to be isn’t the question any more, because now we can have both.

starcrossed

Star-Crossed creator talks background, new series

The rolling hills of Pottsville, Pa., are situated in the heart of the anthracite coal region that stretches from Harrisburg to Scranton. The area thrived through the 19th and early 20th centuries, but the economy has struggled to rebound since the mines were shuttered.

Today, Pottsville is most often described to outsiders as the site of D. G. Yuengling and Son, America’s oldest brewery. Soon, that conversation may include the mention of a successful television writer and producer who calls the city home.

Meredith Averill, a Pottsville native, is the creator and executive producer of the new science-fiction drama Star-Crossed, premiering Monday on the CW. She spoke last week with Curiata.com about the new show and how she came to the television industry.

The title of the series echoes the famous line from the prologue of Romeo and Juliet, and the show updates the tale of forbidden love so familiar to teenaged English students everywhere — with an otherworldly twist. In the pilot episode, an alien humanoid enrolls in a Louisiana high school and a romance develops between him and a human classmate.

The realization of this series is the culmination of a long journey for Averill. Pottsville is a place that can seem as alien to the dreams of a young writer as the Atrians are to the planet where they crash-landed 10 years earlier.

“I always knew I wanted to be a writer, but I didn’t know what kind of writer I wanted to be,” Averill explained.

As a high school student, Averill channeled her passion for writing into her school newspaper, Tide Lines. During those formative years, Averill relied on teachers who supported her writing and parents who “always encouraged me to dream big.”

While it may be far removed from the sound stages of Los Angeles, Pottsville is only three hours away from Manhattan. Averill’s father would frequently take her on trips to New York City when she was in middle and high school, planting the seeds for her to break out of her sleepy hometown and pursue her passions.

“I fell in love with the city, and when I wanted to move there for college — which was a big deal for someone from a small town like Pottsville — my parents didn’t even flinch,” Averill said. “They knew it’s where I needed to be.”

Following in the footsteps of John O’Hara, Pottsville’s most famous writer to date, Averill packed her bags and headed to the Big Apple. She attended New York University, planning to major in cinema studies.

“I loved writing about movies,” Averill said, “so I thought I might go into entertainment journalism, but pretty soon, I realized it wasn’t for me. I was more interested in telling stories rather than critiquing them.”

She changed her major to screenwriting, and “I’ve been writing scripts ever since.”

Television didn’t play a large role in Averill’s life until after she graduated from NYU. She began watching series like Alias, The West Wing, and Twin Peaks on DVD and fell in love with the medium. Like many potential screenwriters, Averill drafted “spec scripts” — unsolicited screenplays either for an original concept or for a show already in existence.

“My first spec script was for Sex & the City, and I’m pretty sure it was terrible, but I had a blast writing it,” Averill recalled.

For her next spec script, she chose to write an episode of Grey’s Anatomy and spent more time studying the structure of a typical episode before putting pen to paper.

“After that, I felt confident enough to write an original pilot spec, which I ended up submitting to a writing program in Los Angeles called ‘Writers on the Verge‘ in 2007, and I was accepted into that program.”

Averill’s first job in television was as an assistant for Josh Appelbaum and André Nemec, a writing team who had also worked as producers on shows like Alias and October Road.

“They gave me my first writing job and hired me as a writer on two of their shows, Life On Mars and Happy Town,” Averill said.

Star-Crossed panel
The cast and crew of Star-Crossed sit on a panel at the 2013 San Diego Comic-Con International. Series creator Meredith Averill, third from left, spoke with Curiata.com.

Now, Appelbaum and Nemec are serving as executive producers on Averill’s show, which marks her transition into the role of show creator.

The new title brings a set of new challenges. Averill is in charge of more than 200 employees at Star-Crossed’s offices in Los Angeles as well as on location in New Orleans, where filming has posed its own challenges. Averill spends most of her time in L.A. with the writers and isn’t able to be on set as often as she would like. However, the advantages to be being a creator outweigh those drawbacks.

“When you work on someone else’s show, you are always trying to anticipate what they might like to see, how they might write a certain character, but it’s fun to be able to apply your own unique voice to these characters,” Averill said. “The best part of being able to create a show … is that the world is yours to play with.”

For Star-Crossed, the creative process began with a three-minute trailer from a Spanish production company. The trailer, titled Oxigeno, centered on a group of alien teenagers being integrated into a high school. The trailer languished as an unrealized project until Averill brought it to life.

“The original idea, I can’t take credit for,” Averill said, “but we got to develop the whole world around it, which was a fun process.”

The series was initially named Oxygen, a translation from the Spanish, but the title had to be changed due to a rights issue with the Oxygen Network.

But what’s in a name?

The new title, Star-Crossed, is befitting of a story in which the main characters come from two different worlds that are not supposed to mix. The titles of the episodes are also taken from lines in Romeo and Juliet. The show, however, is not a modern retelling of Shakespeare’s play.

“We didn’t go out of our way to make any other Shakespearean parallels in the series,” Averill explained. “But I’m sure if you wanted to go looking for some, you could find them.”

Much about the series is indeed original, including the main characters. Emery, played by Aimee Teegarden, is a human girl who has been sick for much of her life and has spent a lot of time in the hospital. Entering high school is an especially new experience for her.

“When thinking about the character of Emery, I liked the idea that she could relate to the Atrians in a way — that she, too, felt like an outsider on her first day of school,” Averill said.

Teegarden was the production team’s first choice to play Emery, and she was the first cast member hired, partly as a result of her role in NBC’s Friday Night Lights. Averill and several other executive producers were fans of the high school football drama, so they were already familiar with Teegarden’s work.

“We knew we needed Emery to have a girl-next-door quality and be instantly likable, but also strong and confident,” Averill said. “We loved [Teegarden] so much on FNL, and after we met with her and found out she is also a huge sci-fi fan, we knew she’d be a great fit.”

Roman, portrayed by Matt Lanter, is the son of the leader of the Atrians, “but he’s also someone who is a bit rebellious and constantly questioning whether integration is really the right move,” Averill said.

Lanter was one of the last cast members to be hired.

“We had a very hard time casting Roman,” Averill said, “because the role requires so much: he has to be noble and strong-willed, but also vulnerable — and, of course, gorgeous, because it is still the CW.”

In fact, it was the teen-oriented network that first suggested Lanter, after the cancellation of his previous show, 90210.

“We met with him and felt immediately he was the right choice, and he was very excited to play a role unlike any other he had played before,” Averill said.

The distinctiveness of Lanter’s character was a conscious choice for Averill and her team. They wanted the Atrians to be a singular extraterrestrial race, but it took several episodes to establish some of their trademark characteristics.

“We knew certain details about the Atrians when we were developing the pilot — the birthmarks, the idea that they had this herb called ‘cyper’ that may or may not have curative properties,” Averill said. “But it wasn’t until we got into the season — and I have to give our writing staff credit for contributing to this — that we really developed who they are as a race, what makes them unique and unlike any other alien race you’ve seen depicted on television or in movies before.”

Star-Crossed panel
Averill poses with fellow executive producer Scott Rosenberg and lead actor Matt Lanter on-set in New Orleans.

One other alien race that some fans have been quick to draw a comparison with have been the aliens of another teen sci-fi drama, Roswell. Even without looking too closely, though, there is one big difference between the two shows: Roswell’s aliens had to live in secret, while the world knows about Star-Crossed’s Atrians. The presence of the Atrians, including the fact that thousands of them live in an internment camp, serves as a backdrop for some of the more serious motifs underlying the series: the politics of integration and the government’s treatment of the Atrians.

“Even though we don’t try to hit you over the head with this theme, Star-Crossed is also a show about racism — and how we treat ‘the other,'” Averill said. “I think that’s what makes it unique and unlike other sci-fi shows you’ve seen.”

So what will Star-Crossed‘s fans have to look forward to this season? According to Averill, a lot.

“The benefit of doing 13 episodes in the first season is that we really jam-packed every episode with as many reveals and juicy mysteries as we could.”

The Atrians’ “powers” — what makes them unique — will be exposed fairly early in the series. About midway through the season, the reason for the Atrians’ crash-landing on Earth will be revealed. The show will also be introducing “warring factions” within each race: the anti-human Trags and the anti-Atrian Red Hawks.

“They’re both equally evil and out for blood,” Averill said. “Their constant battle for power is what drives much of the action in the season — and how our characters work to stop them.”

And, for the teen demographic so important on the CW, Averill teases the romances of the series.

“A new love interest will complicate things for Emery and Roman, who are not our only couple in the show. Some interesting and surprising other pairings will emerge.”

The premiere of Star-Crossed is a big moment in Averill’s career. But Averill, who has also been a producer and writer for The Good Wife, is quick to note that her success would not be possible without plenty of support, both in the television industry and back home in Pottsville.

“I don’t remember who gave it to me, but the best advice I’ve ever been given is, ‘Don’t be a jerk,'” Averill said. “[Television is] a small industry and people know who the jerks are and you don’t want to be one. Be as courteous to the assistants as you would be to the executive producers.”

As for the father who fanned the flames of her passion with those trips to New York when she was a girl, he now lives in Florida and surprised Averill last year by flying to Comic-Con where the cast and crew of Star-Crossed introduced the series. Averill’s mother still lives in Pottsville, and both her parents are just as supportive as ever.

“They’ve now each seen the pilot probably 20 times,” Averill said, “but I know for sure they’ll still be watching [Monday] while wearing their Star-Crossed t-shirts.”

Bringing a television series to the screen is no small accomplishment for the girl from coal country. But Monday’s pilot episode, of course, is just the beginning of a new story.

“I just watched our finale, which we filmed in December, and I feel like I’m not exaggerating or over-selling when I say the season ends with one of the most intense, shocking cliffhangers I’ve seen on television — it’s incredible. And I can’t wait for everyone else to see it!”

At the 'Supernatural' fan convention

‘Fanning Out’: For fanboys and fangirls of all stripes

Nerds, geeks, countrymen: we live in a very fortunate time. For years, we were looked down on, bullied, and made fun of. Not anymore. Now we are part of mainstream pop culture.

Television shows like Doctor Who, The Walking Dead, and Game of Thrones are extremely popular. Chris Hardwick, Zachary Levi, and Nathan Fillion are beloved by fans everywhere because they’re nerds. Also? Nerds now look like Chris Hardwick, Zachary Levi, and Nathan Fillion. (And for the guys, Mila Kunis used to be a big World of Warcraft gamer until too many people started figuring out her screen name.)

One of the best parts of nerd culture is the ability to be fangirls and fanboys. Not to be mistaken with a mere fan, these fanboys and fangirls — I’ll call them fan*s — go above and beyond in their excitement over the things they love. I’m an unabashed fangirl myself, and I’d like to welcome all my fellow fan*s to this space, where we are Fanning Out all we want.

But just what is a fan*? The world’s authority on all things slang defines a “fanboy” as “a passionate fan of various elements of geek culture (e.g. sci-fi, comics, Star Wars, video games, anime, hobbits, Magic: the Gathering, etc.), but who lets his passion override social graces.” Not the most flattering portrayal, but probably not wrong either.

The definition for “fangirl” is similar, but with a more judgmental tone: “Fangirls congregate at anime conventions and livejournal. Have been known to glomp, grope, and tackle when encountering said obesessions.” [sic]

Considering the author of this entry can’t even spell “obsessions” correctly, I’m going to try not to be too offended by his or her suggestion that, for some reason, being a fangirl is obsessive while being a fanboy is just passion. Boys are just as capable of being obsessive as girls. But I digress.

The truth is, we all have a little fan* in us. You can deny it all you want, but we are all passionate about something, whether it’s television, movies, music, art, books — there’s always something. Not sure whether you’re just a normal fan or a full-fledged fan*? See if you can sympathize with any of the statements below.

You might be a fan* if …

  1. You’re still disappointed you didn’t receive an owl with your acceptance to Hogwarts when you turned 11 (even if you turned 11 years before Harry Potter existed). It’s similar to the disappointment you felt when you realized that old wardrobe at your grandparents’ didn’t lead to another world, or that police box isn’t really bigger on the inside (but you keep checking both just in case).
  2. You have a definite opinion on who is the best captain: Kirk, Picard, Reynolds, Harkness, or Sparrow. And are prepared to debate your opinion at any given time. The same goes for which ship is better: the Enterprise, Serenity, Moya, the Millennium Falcon … Let’s not even get into the argument about which Enterprise is better.
  3. The mere thought of not getting your tickets to Comic-Con makes you hyperventilate. No joke: that episode of The Big Bang Theory a couple weeks ago? I know several people who have admitted that is their worst nightmare; one friend even said she turned the show off and couldn’t watch until after the real Comic-Con badges went on sale and she knew she was going.
  4. You’ve ever designed your own shirt/sign/poster for an event, hoping your favorite celebrity in attendance will notice you. This may sound like a shameless call for attention to some, but take it from me: it works. Also, if you meet this celebrity more than once with similarly designed shirts, they just might remember you.
  5. You’ve waited more than an hour for an autograph/photo/handshake/hug/brief sighting. I’ve done this numerous times and don’t regret it at all. Except maybe that one time when we could have been watching Vanilla Ice and instead stood outside praying for a glimpse of Donnie Wahlberg (and all we got was Nick Lachey).
  6. You have dreamed about the exact conversation you would have upon meeting your favorite celebrity … but, when that day arrives, all you can manage is a breathless, “Hi.”
  7. You’re completely comfortable with your sexuality and aren’t afraid to admit you have crushes on celebs of both sexes. I mean, who doesn’t love Jennifer Lawrence? And Daryl Dixon, Agent Melinda May, or the Winchesters?
  8. You’ve been honing your paintball and/or chair-walking skills just in case you need them when least expected — like in the middle of study hall.
  9. You know that a “ship” is so much more than a vessel that floats on water. And they have names like Caskett and Klaine. And you spend half your time wondering if these ships will ever sail. And desperately hope they will.
  10. Tumblr.
  11. The word “Reichenbach” reduces you to the fetal position with your thumb in your mouth.
  12. You own or have read/seen/listened to everything your favorite celebrity has ever done. This includes sitting in front of your computer for several hours, watching episode after episode of the British sitcom Suburban Shootout on YouTube because Tom Hiddleston. And who else has downloaded the soundtrack for August: Osage County solely for Benedict Cumberbatch? (You’re really dedicated if you watched Breaking Dawn — Part 2 just for Lee Pace.)
  13. “Carry On Wayward Son” will always hold a special place in your heart.
  14. You’ve ever attended the midnight screening/release of a movie, book, DVD, video game, or anything else. Bonus points if you’ve actually dressed up in costume for one of these events. Sports fans, don’t think you’re exempt here. Showing up early to a game to tailgate, with faces and chests painted, wearing every item of clothing in your team’s colors you can possibly find — that’s the equivalent of going to the midnight premiere of The Hobbit dressed as a hobbit.
  15. You understand the meaning of terms like “squee,” “feels,” “OTP,” and the aforementioned “ship.”

If you’ve reached the end of this list and you’ve been nodding along with any or all of these points, then you’re probably a fan* whether you like it or not. And this list just scratches the surface.

If you’ve discovered that perhaps you are one of us, keep in mind there’s nothing to be ashamed of. As one of the characters from the show Leverage used to say, it’s “the age of the geek.” So embrace your inner nerd and enjoy the ride. Trust me, it’s a lot more fun once you give into it.

And don’t forget to come back here weekly as I’ll be discussing TV, books, movies — all the things that are worth Fanning Out for. Until next time, “May the odds be ever in your favor.”

zombie02

From bloaty to sparkly: Tracing monster origins

Monsters, some say, are a means by which society can separate out the most abhorrent and depraved aspects within itself. If a man can walk into an elementary school and murder 20 children, it’s much easier for people to call him a monster — an “other” — than to admit he is a part of our own in-group.

There is much of the monster in us, and much of us in him. Perhaps this “othering” is a healthy process, enabling us to deal harshly with law breakers by removing our empathetic mercy and species-preservation instincts. White blood cells don’t attack cancer, after all, because they think the diseased cells are a part of the body.

Anyway, I suggest watching Joss Whedon’s Cabin in the Woods for a more thorough (and bloody brilliant) examination of those themes. I’m here to talk to you about words and stuff. So let’s take a look at three of the most popular monsters in media lately — vampires, werewolves, and zombies — where they come from, and what makes them tick.

 

Vampires

Nobody really knows where the word “vampire” came from. Best guess is the Slovak vrepit’ sa, which means “to thrust into or stick to.” I guess, because vampires … ah … thrust … their teeth into your flesh? I dunno. Anyway, the term came from Eastern Europe in the early 17th century, but similar figures appear all over the world long beforehand, from the Mayan camazotz, which was a head-snatching bat god, to the Japanese kappa, who were river-dwelling blood drinkers (and rapists to boot).

A lot of corpses were exhumed during the 17th and 18th centuries all over Eastern Europe, from Romania to Austria, as rumors were circulating of unexplained killings of people and animals. (Mind you, this was happening at the same time the United States was being founded and rational philosophies were spreading through German intellectual circles.) The dug-up bodies looked purple and bloated, like ticks, with blood streaming from their mouths — almost as though they’d been drinking human blood! (Of course, many bodies swell with gas after death, causing fluids to seep out. Oops.) These bodies were then variously decapitated, dismembered, driven into the ground with spikes, staked through the heart, mouth, and stomach, and stuffed with garlic.

Belief in vampires never completely died out, but the periods of mass hysteria associated with the phenomenon were relatively short-lived. Our current conceptions about vampires largely come from Bram Stoker’s 1897 horror novel Dracula, in which the vampires’ various strengths and weaknesses are spelled out explicitly. Anne Rice popularized the idea of a sympathetic vampire in the late 20th century, and, most recently, Stephenie Meyer made them sparkle. If vampires do exist, these more recent portrayals must grate on their nerves terribly.

Werewolves

Wer” means “man” in Old English. There, we’re done! Nah, just kidding.

The idea of transforming into animals is not any newer than of drinking blood to steal someone’s power. It happened all the time, from the Norse berserker (“bear shirt”) to the Grecian gods, who turned into all manner of things in order to see what having sex with different species was like. Zeus transformed a guy named Lycaon into a wolf for attempting to feed the Thunder God baby meat (for some reason). Typically, people turn into wolves either from a curse, a pact with a demon, lying out under a full moon, or even drinking a specific kind of beer (probably an Oktoberfest).

While werewolves became popular in Eastern Europe about a century before vampires, they share a lot of commonalities. In Serbia, a single term (vulkodlak) is used for both. Vampires are sometimes purported to be able to change form to that of a wolf or to use wolves as “familiars” (a sort of mentally controlled animal). The sign of pointed fangs from the werewolf condition indirectly led to the idea of vampire fangs. Both monsters are frequently considered cursed or possessed by evil spirits. Werewolves, however, are mostly not already dead and can even be cured! The best cure is to stab them in the head with a knife (though sometimes exorcism, or even just scolding, will do the trick). The silver bullet thing was totally tacked on later, in the 1941 film The Wolf Man.

Turning into a wolf doesn’t seem that impressive, next to coming back from the dead and enthralling people. But wolves are scary! Imagine videos you’ve seen of guard dogs taking down men in heavy padding, then picture that with an animal of twice the size and bulk, razor sharp claws and teeth, coming at you with six of his buddies. Obviously, knife to the head is the best option available here. Good luck.

Zombies

The word “zombie” doesn’t have a cut-and-dry meaning, though it may be partially related to the Congolese nzambi, which means “god.” I guess because zombies defy death and can’t be hurt? It’s also alike to the word “simbi,” which is a kind of Haitian water snake spirit. (More specifically, the simbi is a Loa, or Lwa, which is an intermediary between the creator and humanity that can possess human hosts and ride them around.)

The origins of these creatures come from West African vodou, where sorcerer-shamans called bokor trapped human soul-bits in their fetishes (magic objects) to enhance their power. In Haiti, bokor killed people (typically, bad news bears that the common folk didn’t much mind dying) and brought them back to life as slaves. One theory is that the bokor actually used pufferfish powder to send their victims into a state of near-death, as well as inflicting brain damage to make them more susceptible to mental control upon their waking up (those that survived the ordeal, anyway).

How did these undead Haitian man-servants turn into the apocalyptic plague-drones we now associate with the term? The 1932 Bela Lugosi film White Zombie introduced American culture to the word and the concept, still used at the time to describe a sorcerer’s voodoo slave. From there, George A. Romero mixed the general idea of zombies with Richard Matheson’s vampires (found in I Am Legend), and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein before it, to create his weird, shambling hybrids in the vastly influential 1968 Night of the Living Dead. Romero didn’t call them zombies in the film (or explain them at all, really) but used the term exclusively in its sequels. From there, the idea and the word became inextricably linked, and people have since mostly associated zombies with some scientific cause rather than vodoun magicks.

 

Yep, popular culture has come a long way from the original mythology that surrounds our various monsters. It’s almost hard to recognize them anymore. And once we do recognize them, it has certainly become more difficult to stab them in the head with knives. After all, they sure do look a lot like us, don’t they?

Rumble-2014

‘Road to WrestleMania’ begins at Royal Rumble

After five months of terrible booking, we’ve finally reached that special time of year when WWE is bearable to watch. And perhaps no WWE show is more bearable than the Royal Rumble.

This year’s show is headlined by a WWE Super-Duper Extra Special Heavyweight Championship match between Randy “Bland White Guy” Orton and John “Bland White Guy” Cena in a “We Ran Out of Stipulations” match that’s sure to be as compelling as a Maven promo.

But we all know the real main event is the eponymous Royal Rumble match. Thirty wrestlers enter, only one can win. Unless it’s 1994.

This year’s Rumble match is expected to be an exciting one. Unlike previous years, there is no obvious winner, though there are some heavy favorites. So let’s take a look at the top contenders to win big this year, forecast where the win could take them, and argue what would be best for our entertainment.


Batista

Chances of Winning: Very High

Returning just in time for the Royal Rumble seems incredibly lucky, and definitely tilts the betting odds in The Animal’s favor. However, being announced ahead of time removes the virtual guarantee of victory that a surprise number 30 return holds.

Batista’s homecoming allows a plethora of interesting story lines going forward. Does The Animal take on the Beast, Brock Lesnar, at WrestleMania XXX? Or does Big Dave aim to be the new “face of the company,” either challenging Randy Orton, or turning heel and joining The Authority to replace The Viper? Any of these options allows for Batista to win the battle royal and move on to WrestleMania.

The most likely outcome from my perspective is a one-on-one dream match with Lesnar. Despite Lesnar’s claims to the number one contendership, I don’t think this match needs the WWE Championship on the line, and it would be stupid to take the belt away from a full-time star who has worked the entire year. Then again, The Rock was WWE Champion last year, so fairness is clearly not a factor in booking WrestleMania.

Equally as likely, in keeping with the unfair nature of WWE booking, would be Batista winning the Rumble and putting Orton away in the main event of WrestleMania, proving that WWE’s long-term booking plans were never about getting anyone new over.

My hope would be for The Animal to join The Authority, replacing Orton after his failure to defeat Cena, opening the door for a WrestleMania main event of D.B. vs D.B.: WWE Champion Batista vs Royal Rumble winner Daniel Bryan.

Possible WrestleMania Opponents: Brock Lesnar (most likely), Randy Orton, Daniel Bryan


Bray Wyatt

Chances of Winning: Lowest

Bray Wyatt is perhaps the largest outside shot in this list, but he could be the Franklin Pierce of the 2014 Rumble. (Franklin Pierce was never expected to be a presidential candidate, but he earned the Democratic nomination when the party could not agree on anyone else. He then proceeded to become the 14th President of the United States.) Wyatt, who models himself as this dimension’s Galactus, has certainly devoured the world of our expectations. It’s said that Wyatt is a personal favorite of Vince McMahon, which means good things for our friendly neighborhood cult leader.

Unfortunately for older fans, the most likely opponent for Wyatt in such a scenario is The Champ himself, John Cena. Cena vs. Wyatt could undoubtedly make for an entertaining story line heading into the Show of Shows, so this is another matchup that should not be about the WWE Championship. Bray’s creepy antics and violent tendencies would make for a great foil to pro wrestling’s Superman, and there’s no doubt the match could be an interesting watch.

This seems to be a pretty strong idea for a match at WrestleMania, but again, it doesn’t need a WWE Championship attached to it to make the match compelling.

Possible WrestleMania Opponents: John Cena, Daniel Bryan, the Shield


CM Punk

Chances of Winning: High

Even entering the Rumble match at number one, CM Punk has a higher chance than most to win, but it still seems unlikely. The Straight Edge Savior’s WrestleMania spot seems set in stone: a clash with Triple H for which the foundation is already being laid. However, if the last year is any indication, feuding with The Game does not mean you will ever actually wrestle him. Alternately, Punk could be building toward a one-on-one with Randy Orton in the main event.

Punk is long overdue for the final slot on the WrestleMania card. Shafted in that respect by WWE booking for two years in a row, the Second City Saint spent 434 days as WWE Champion without getting to defend his title in the final match of the Show of Shows. To put that in perspective, The Miz, King Kong Bundy, and Bam Bam Bigelow all closed out WrestleMania at some point in their careers.

Despite this obvious injustice, WWE appears intent on booking Triple H vs. CM Punk in what should be a very colorful feud — as long as Punk is allowed to let loose. This means Punk is likely to get knocked out of the Rumble match through less-than-clean circumstances. That will allow him to move forward with the anti-authority story line that promises to birth some very good promos, at least from Punk (with Triple H only pretending he’s on the Best in the World’s level).

In the best possible scenario, CM Punk wins the WWE title in the Elimination Chamber and faces Daniel Bryan in the single greatest WrestleMania main event ever. That, however, is the craziest of dreams.

Possible WrestleMania Opponents: Triple H, Randy Orton


Roman Reigns

Chances of Winning: Low

Another outside shot whose chances in the Rumble are dependent on Vince McMahon’s whims. Remember in the early days of the ECW “brand” when Paul Heyman wanted to build his show around CM Punk, and Vince said: No, the future is in Bobby Lashley? Clearly, Vince knows his stuff. Anyway, Lashley was nowhere near ready, while Punk was already blazing trails and getting over based on in-ring performance alone. So, as expected, Vince went with the bland meathead.

Roman Reigns is no Lashley. Reigns is great. Reigns has potential. Roman Reigns, however, is perhaps the third most talented guy in The Shield. Being the third best in The Shield still makes you better than 90 percent of professional wrestlers, but it shouldn’t warrant a rushed push. Still, that’s obviously the direction WWE is deciding to go, leaving Rollins and Ambrose to either find a new partner or end the hottest gimmick WWE has introduced in a decade.

Rumor is that Roman Reigns’s push is expected to see him plow through the roster in the Royal Rumble. While the Diesel push could be fun to watch, he certainly shouldn’t win the match. The money match for The Shield is either in a six-man tag against the Wyatt’s (remember that pop when they got into a scrape?) or a triple threat among his fellow soon-to-be-former members of The Shield.

If Reigns does shock the world and win the match, his opponent at the big show should definitely be Randy Orton. A win at the Rumble would propel Reigns into stardom and certainly give him some solid babyface support. That kind of popularity, however, would be no match for John Cena’s, who only gets booed out of the building when he is facing much cooler wrestlers than Reigns — guys like Edge, Rob Van Dam, CM Punk, and Daniel Bryan.

Possible WrestleMania Opponents: Seth Rollins and Dean Ambrose, Randy Orton, John Cena, the Wyatt’s


Brock Lesnar

Chances of Winning: Low

As of now, the Beast isn’t even an entrant in the Royal Rumble, but that could simply be a swerve. Brock Lesnar as a surprise number 30 would blow the roof off the building, and the likely confrontation with Batista would immediately ignite a WrestleMania feud. Lesnar could eliminate The Animal and win the Rumble, with Batista taking the belt in the Chamber, setting up the epic clash of big men on the Grandest Stage of Them All.

Lesnar has long been rumored to be The Undertaker’s opponent for this installment of The Streak, but that seems to be losing favor with the fear that his rough style could hurt the aging Phenom. Another option for Lesnar at WrestleMania would be for him to win the title at Elimination Chamber, becoming The Authority’s new champion and a seemingly unbeatable force, to be conquered at WrestleMania by either his 2013 SummerSlam opponent, CM Punk, or the people’s choice, Daniel Bryan, either of which promises to be an awesome match.

The best decision may simply be to leave the Beast out of the Rumble match and book him against Batista (see above). Their clash should be about who is better and stronger, not about a championship that neither has held in years. And if Lesnar isn’t going to win, he shouldn’t be anywhere near the Rumble match.

Possible WrestleMania Opponents: Batista, The Undertaker, Daniel Bryan


Daniel Bryan

Chances of Winning: High

It’s very rare that the sentimental favorite for the Royal Rumble is considered an unlikely victor for the match. I list Bryan as highly likely to win because of the grassroots support for the man, and because it would be the best next step in Bryan Danielson’s long journey to being a legitimate WWE Champion. Despite this, WWE’s booking of Bryan has clearly been terrible, and it seems unlikely Vince is going to trust the man with the WrestleMania main event, despite his overwhelming popularity.

We all want Daniel Bryan to win this match. Even though I am a CM Punk fan first, I want Bryan to win the WWE Championship at WrestleMania. There is no better possible conclusion to the terrible Authority story line than Punk defeating Triple H, and Bryan finally obtaining the WWE Championship (again).

Unfortunately, the question of who his WrestleMania opponent would be is very tricky. WWE can’t possibly sell Orton vs. Bryan as the main event of another pay-per-view (is that word anachronistic now?), and while John Cena vs. Daniel Bryan II would be huge, it’s doubtful that anyone in WWE would allow Bryan to beat Cena twice. No one gets that kind of honor. Cena vs. Bryan also lacks the payoff for the god-awful Authority story line, unless — and this is highly unlikely and ill-advised — Cena turns heel and joins the McMahons.

Recent rumors have indicated Bryan is a possible challenger to The Streak this year. The chances of that pairing almost make all of the terrible booking of the past year acceptable. Is there any other man in or out of WWE who would give The Deadman such a good match? And with his never-say-die character, Bryan could get an amazing rub and look unbelievable in his inevitable defeat.

Daniel Bryan manages to be simultaneously the best choice and the least likely to win the Rumble match, which makes judging his odds difficult. I stand by my ranking of Bryan as highly likely to win, despite my better judgment saying it won’t happen.

Possible WrestleMania Opponents: The Undertaker, Randy Orton, John Cena, Batista, Brock Lesnar, Bray Wyatt


The Odds

Superstar
Odds
Batista
2:1
Daniel Bryan
3:1
CM Punk
5:1
Roman Reigns
10:1
Brock Lesnar
15:1
Bray Wyatt
25:1

 

Ultimately, Batista is the odds-on favorite to win the Rumble match. However, Daniel Bryan has forged an amazing connection with fans around the world who want to see him succeed more than anything. The question is whether or not Vince McMahon is willing to accept this fact and give the people what they want. Knowing the McMahon track record, this seems highly unlikely, but we can always hope.

After all, WWE thrives on hope. We hope for our heroes to vanquish the dragons and defeat their own demons. We hope the hard worker will get his time in the sun. We hope Triple H won’t cut a 30-minute promo, running down the entire roster. And we hope to see John Cena win against the monsters like Khali and lose to the workers like Bryan and Punk. We hope. And, every once in a while, WWE lets us believe.

Let’s hope Sunday, January 26, is one of those times.