Category Archives: culture

woman-hammer

Old-school feminism still needed to this day

I have spent my first few columns talking about unconventional ways of being a feminist: I’ve argued that a feminist doesn’t have to be a man-hater. I advocated for equal treatment of the sexes in professional wrestling. I defended the practice of critiquing Oscars fashion. But sometimes, reality slaps us in the face with some good, old-fashioned sexism, forcing feminists back to basics.

During discussions with friends and coworkers about feminism, I often run into the sentiment that feminism isn’t really needed anymore. Women are a protected class in employment, and basic rights, like voting, are guaranteed. We are free to pursue a career or to stay at home as we see fit. Even barriers in the most male-dominated walks of life, including the military, are falling.

All of this is true and good, but each of these protections is merely a legal designation. The law does not dictate attitudes or the day-to-day treatment of women. Discrimination based on sex still exists today. For most women, overt discrimination is not a daily problem. Sometimes, I go months without facing it. But when it does happen, it stings like a slap in the face.

One of the many hats I wear is as an employee in the retail shop at a sports recreation venue. In addition to selling merchandise, the store also functions as our pro shop, so I have been trained to assess equipment to determine what repair or service they may need. I have received the same training as my male colleagues, and science has yet to find compelling evidence to suggest that my physiology has any effect on my ability to examine sports equipment. Nonetheless, over the past weekend, I endured two different instances in which I was put down simply for being a woman.

Several days ago, a man who I estimate was in his late 60s or early 70s came into the shop to have his equipment serviced. He stated that he wasn’t sure what kind of service they required. I looked them over and recommended a specific type of tuning. He looked at me and said, “I would appreciate if you would go get one of the guys from the back to look at them.” I smiled, gritted my teeth, and ventured into the back of the shop looking for the male technician on duty. He looked over the equipment and recommended the exact same service I did.

To say I was furious would have been an understatement. To make matters worse, I was simply told that the industry was a “boys’ club” and I’d just have to get used to it. I’m sorry, but no, I don’t have to get used to it. There is no reason why I, or anyone, should be a victim of discrimination because someone else is trapped by ignorant thinking.

Not 24 hours later, I was on duty again. Another man, this one seeming to be in his early 50s, was having trouble with his footwear. I was working on them with some tools I had been trained to use, and he stated that, as a machinist by trade, he was uncomfortable with a female using tools on his equipment.

At this point, I was literally speechless. I had no words to either defend myself or chastise him. I finished what I was doing, and he insisted that something still wasn’t quite right. I summoned the male technician again; he took the footwear apart and put it back together. Magically, the customer found the problem had been solved. After the man left, I asked the technician if he had done anything different then I had. He informed me he had not.

The message here was loud and clear: you are a female; therefore, you are incapable of this.

No laws were violated in these cases, but that does not mean I was not discriminated against. I was belittled and dismissed for no reason other than being female. This is why we still need individuals, both female and male, to stand up and say, “Yes, I am a feminist, and actions like this are offensive.”

The topic of gender roles is a deep, deep well. We can debate the value of the yin and the yang in two-parent households on another day. But we should all be able to concede some simple points about the absurdity of some “traditional” perspectives about what men and women cannot do.

Maybe I don’t have the same physical strength to drive a sledgehammer as my husband or my father does. But the fine motor skills, like tuning and tapping, that I employ in my job? We know that a woman’s ability to operate basic hand tools like a screwdriver or a hammer has little to do with our double-X chromosomes. More to the point, there are men in this world who wouldn’t even know which end of the hammer to hold, so to assume that men are automatically better at mechanical things is just plain silly.

There are certain skills that both men and women would find useful to make it through a lifetime: knowing how to swing a hammer is one, doing a load of laundry properly is another. Neither of these skills should be exclusive to sex, and yet somehow, even in 2014, they are inextricably linked by some.

I came home after these two instances and relayed the stories to my husband. Being the modern urban gentleman that he is, he was appalled that people not only still thought this way, but that they weren’t even embarrassed to display such discrimination in public. Unfortunately, even the most dedicated male feminists will never face this issue in the way a female will. The burden falls on women to fight this backward and offensive way of thinking. And that’s why old-school, girl-power feminism is still relevant today.

walker

Some stars have softer sides, donate time

Fan*s can sometimes be obsessed with the on-screen work of their favorite actors. There’s nothing wrong with that; after all, I’m one of you! But what really makes a star of the screen worth adoring is what they do when the camera isn’t on them.

The media loves to talk about celebrities behaving badly. It seems we’re constantly seeing stories about stars getting arrested or going to rehab or egging people’s houses. Reality shows earn half of Hollywood a living showing the negative sides of stardom.

However, we rarely get to see stories in the news about the good things celebrities do for others. Sure, we all know a lot of celebrities donate and support charities. They are often photographed at dinners and various other fundraising events. However, there are some who choose to get more actively involved in the causes they care about. Here are just a few of those who use their fame for a better purpose.

Several members of the cast of Glee, including Chris Colfer, Darren Criss, and Jane Lynch, are big supporters of The Trevor Project, which provides “crisis intervention and suicide prevention for LGBTQ youth.” Bret Michaels, of Poison and Celebrity Apprentice fame, supports the American Diabetes Association and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, plus his mother helped start the Harrisburg Diabetic Youth Camp, a weeklong summer camp for children with diabetes in Harrisburg, Pa.

When Paul Walker passed away last year, we not only lost a good actor, but a great humanitarian. Hours after Haiti was hit by a devastating earthquake in 2010, Walker was organizing a group of friends to travel to the island and help, even with no way of knowing what he could do. Out of this came Reach Out WorldWide, an organization founded by Walker to organize first responders for natural disasters. Since Walker’s death, his brother Cody has joined the organization as brand manager, and ROWW is determined to continue the mission Walker started.

In real life, the much loved Tom Hiddleston couldn’t be more different from his hugely popular role as the trouble-making Loki in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Last year, Hiddleston traveled to Guinea in West Africa with UNICEF UK. While there, he met with children and families and had the opportunity to tour several UNICEF project sites and learn about the work the group has been doing. Hiddleston shared his own thoughts about his time in Guinea. A few months later, he also participated in the Global Poverty Project’s “Live Below the Line” challenge, which asks participants to spend less than $1.50 per day for five days.

Vampire Diaries and Lost star Ian Somerhalder is a big animal lover, and several years ago he started his own organization, the Ian Somerhalder Foundation, which fights animal cruelty and raises awareness of global deforestation and conservation efforts. Somerhalder has been very active with the organization and maintains an online presence promoting the foundation and encouraging his fans to get involved.

Teen Wolf has a reputation for being a hormone-fueled drama in which guys just run around with their shirts off. While this isn’t necessarily true — there’s actually a lot more going on in that show than shirtless hunks — some of the series’ stars have decided to use that perception to their advantage. Toward the end of 2013, they launched Reflect it Back, a website selling calendars featuring photos of several Teen Wolf actors as well as some of their friends. The proceeds from the calendars go toward a fund to battle cystic fibrosis. The site also encourages fans to share what cause they are passionate about. In this way, the actors are encouraging activism in their young fanbase.

Fan*s know Zachary Levi as the star of the series Chuck and recent co-star as Fandral in Thor: The Dark World. In 2011, Levi founded “Nerd HQ” through his Nerd Machine website dedicated to nerd culture. Nerd HQ is an event at Comic-Con that has become almost as popular as the main event itself. Last year’s edition included autograph signings, a screening of Serenity, after-parties where fans mingled and danced with celebrities, and a panel series called “Conversations for a Cause” — an opportunity for many Fan* favorites to appear on panels where the proceeds go towards Operation Smile.

Operation Smile is an organization that provides surgeries to repair cleft lips, palates, and other facial dysmorphism in children all around the world. Nerd HQ raised $40,000 for the organization its first year and has grown exponentially, last year bringing in $215,000 through panels featuring celebrities like Nathan Fillion, Matt Smith, Jenna-Louise Coleman, Richard Madden, Hiddleston, and more. This year, the Nerd Machine is also serving as the title sponsor for Operation Smile’s third annual Park City Celebrity Smile Challenge, which partners celebrities with professional and amateur skiers to raise money for the organization’s efforts.

Perhaps one of my favorite celebrities when it comes to interaction with fans — and selflessly working for others — is Misha Collins. Supernatural fans know Collins as the angel Castiel, and he has developed a devoted following of “minions” on Twitter. While his character on Supernatural is often very serious, Collins himself has proven he has a wicked sense of humor and a wild imagination. With the help of his dedicated followers, Collins founded the non-profit organization Random Acts, which sponsors several events throughout the year, including “A Melee of Kindness” (AMOK), which occurred just last weekend. Participants all over the world “ran amok,” performing random acts of kindness such as shoveling sidewalks and “paying it forward” for future customers by buying “suspended coffees” or taping change to vending machines.

Through Random Acts, Collins also began “Hope 2 Haiti,” a campaign to benefit those affected by the 2010 earthquake. For the past three summers, anyone who has been interested in participating could raise money to travel to Haiti with Collins to work in the town of Jacmel. In 2012, actor Colin Ferguson — known for his roles on Syfy’s Eureka and Haven raised funds and joined the team, helping to work on building a children’s center, completed last summer. Random Acts isn’t planning any more trips to Haiti, but the group is still accepting donations to continue to support their projects in Jacmel.

Collins also created the Greatest International Scavenger Hunt the World Has Ever Seen, more commonly referred to as GISHWHES. For the past three years, GISHWHES has earned a place in the Guinness Book of World Records for the largest online scavenger hunt. Participants have to stage or find and then photograph items straight out of Collins’ insane imagination — items such as a person covered in cotton candy, artwork made out of candy, a Christmas Tree floating with helium balloons … and the list just gets crazier. Collins uses this Scavenger Hunt not just as a way for fans to have fun while competing for a chance to hang out with the actor himself, but as a way to spread his dedication to Random Acts. Each year, at least one or two of the items on the scavenger hunt list involve some sort of act of kindness: some participants visited hospital patients, while some handed out random gifts. GISHWHES requires a donation to participate, and all the money left after funding the prizes is donated to Random Acts.

So the next time you hear a report about yet another celebrity going to rehab, or some other negative news story, remember there are some out there who are doing real good in the world and attempting to make a difference, whether it’s through donations to an organization or by creating their own organizations and recruiting their fans to help. Represent your fandom well by being a part of these great opportunities.

adams

Don’t be afraid to rate Oscars fashion

In the first edition of “A Feminist Sensibility,” I mentioned the unfortunate practice of calling out feminists for not being “feminist enough.” This time of year, I find myself defending my feminism more than ever because I enjoy talking about the makeup, heels, and sparkly dresses on all our favorite stars of film, television, and stage.

I absolutely love awards season in Hollywood. I know there are individuals out there who feel like the whole thing is nothing more than Hollywood patting itself on the back, but I think it’s a great time when we get to recognize not just actors, but directors, writers, make-up artists, and all the other participants who contribute to our entertainment.

I love watching the red carpet coverage on E!, and I sometimes find myself defending my enjoyment of this to those around me, and sometimes even to myself. But I’ve come to realize that my love of fashion and the pleasure I get from watching red carpet coverage doesn’t need to conflict with my feminist sensibility.

To me, fashion is wearable art. It conveys a message to the world around you about your style, sense of adventure, and overall personality. The Oscars ceremony, held last Sunday, is the grandest of them all, and the grown-up equivalent to prom. It is also definitely the most decadent when it comes to wardrobe choices.

If I had to sum up this year’s Academy Awards fashion in one word it would be “timeless.” The actresses that made their way down the carpet mostly favored a structured, old Hollywood glam look. Some of my favorites in these classy starlet gowns were Sandra Bullock, Amy Adams, Kate Hudson, and Charlize Theron.

There were some other actresses that shied away from the structured fabrics and tailored designs in favor of more flow or a glitzy look. Two of these notable standouts were Lupita Nyong’o and Cate Blanchett. Nyong’o looked stunning in a long, flowing, pale blue Prada dress. She stated in one red carpet interview that she actually participated in the design process for that dress. Blanchett was breathtaking in an Armani gown that made her glow like a chandelier.

I thought all the ladies looked at least “good,” although some could have raised the bar to “excellent” by choosing dresses that were better-suited to their age or body type. I adore Anna Kendrick, and I hope someday she will marry into my family so we can sing duets and go shopping together. Despite my affection for her, I think she missed the mark with her dress. She’s so youthful, light, and stunning; that dress was a little too gothic, too dark, and too matronly, all in one fell swoop. I think the gothic look can be extremely well done, and Kendrick probably could have pulled it off if she would have committed to the overall look, but as it was, the dress paired with that make-up and those accessories felt disjointed.

Let me just take a moment to share my thoughts with everyone about Liza Minnelli. Liza was rocking an age-appropriate pantsuit in cobalt blue with matching blue hairstreaks. As soon as she hit the red carpet, critics were taking to Twitter to chastise her for not wearing appropriate (or any) undergarments, some even calling it obscene. If Liza were a 20-something with perky breasts going sans bra, would people be calling it obscene or just plain hot? The idea that it’s acceptable for young, attractive women with tight bodies to go without a bra, but not the older ladies, is just plain ridiculous. Personally, I wouldn’t go to an awards show without a bra or cups in my dress, but if there is someone who feels comfortable enough with her own body to do so, more power to her.

As for the male fashion, I’ve been trying to encourage The Modern Urban Gentleman for his comments, but I’m not sure that he’ll weigh in, so I’ll give you my thoughts. It always seems that the ladies get to express themselves way more than the men do at these awards shows, so I was happy to see some variances from the standard black tuxedo. I really enjoyed Will Smith‘s fashion statement: a classic suit, but instead of the traditional accouterments, he completed the look with a patterned necktie scarf and matching pocket square. Another notable look was Ryan Seacrest in his white dinner jacket with black pants and black bow tie. Interestingly, Jared Leto sported an almost identical look, but opting for a maroon bow tie instead. Last, but not least, I’m giving out my best classical black tie look award to Chiwetel Ejiofur. The only mistake in that ensemble was pairing a tux with a wristwatch. It’s the Oscars, my friend: Where else could you possibly have to be?

Feminism is about standing up and declaring that you will not let someone else tell you what you should or shouldn’t do or like. So if you are a secret fashionista, come out of hiding and let me know: Did I miss any of your favorites? Leave your thoughts in the comments!

butler

Butler, Fruitvale Station snubs show prejudice

In the past 20 years, 120 films have received Academy Awards nominations for Best Picture. Of those nominees, only 17 featured nonwhite leads, and those characters were primarily athletes, entertainers, and criminals.

Is this evidence that a movie starring a white man is inherently better?

Do this year’s nominations mean there was only one good movie made by a black director in 2013?

Can the Academy only nominate one movie with a black star each year?

The answer to the first two questions is obviously, “No,” but digging deeper into that third question may uncover a real problem.

2013 was a good year for movies about the black experience, but it has not translated into Oscars recognition. 12 Years a Slave is likely to win the award for Best Picture tonight, but it is the only nominee in the category featuring any nonwhite lead. Many movie buffs were left shocked at the lack of nominations for two strong films with black lead actors: Lee Daniels’ The Butler and Fruitvale Station were completely shut out by the Academy.

Many argue that the oversight was simply due to the films’ midyear releases. Others, myself included, worry it may be something more. It would appear the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is suffering from the same problem as the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences, which generated anger by awarding a Grammy to Macklemore over a collection of black artists. In response to the lack of recognition by both academies, some fans of the artists on the short end have cried “racism.”

I disagree. What’s at play here is not a matter of racism. To be racist is to knowingly bear resentment against a person for their ethnicity or the color of their skin. The Academy’s lack of recognition for The Butler and Fruitvale Station is not a malicious action to deny the artistic value of these works, but rather a subconscious prejudice against movies that are harder for these voters to relate to.

To be prejudiced is not to be racist. To have prejudice is not blatant or malicious. Every one of us has some kind of prejudice. The Academy has a prejudice, too. It suffers from a lack of understanding different cultures — a problem that is unavoidable in such an homogenous body: the members of the Academy are 94 percent white. (12 Years a Slave managed to overcome this prejudice, in part, because of its strong white supporting cast.)

Perhaps this is why Fruitvale Station received no love from the Academy. The old, rich, white folks who make up the voting body simply cannot relate to the everyday challenges in the life of Oscar Grant. The film, starring Michael B. Jordan as Grant, was hard for me, a white male, to get into at first. Grant, a 22-year-old man who was believed to have been a victim of police brutality, is shown unknowingly living his last day on Earth. Writer and director Ryan Coogler artfully tells Grant’s story in a raw and real way, showing the everyday life of a good, if flawed, man.

Fruitvale Station is just not the type of movie that I would typically enjoy. It felt almost too real, at times too mundane, and Grant was a man with whom it was difficult to sympathize at first. However, it wasn’t long before I found myself questioning the prejudice that plagued my view of the movie. As a regular movie viewer, I’ve become conditioned to expect certain things in my movies even as I profess to oppose that mentality. It took some time before I was able to look past the fact that the sets were dirty and the people weren’t all beautiful — that the world the characters lived in was my own, and that this story was not going to have a happy ending.

Our prejudice influences our immersion into movies. It’s only natural that we try to latch onto the character who is most like us when watching a film. We like to see ourselves as Captain Phillips or Dr. Ryan Stone as we wonder how we would handle the difficult circumstances these characters face. We find it easier to live vicariously through Jordan Belfort as he behaves extravagantly because it’s what any one of us would love to do if there were no consequences.

It is harder, though, to become engrossed in a film that is about a real life, not like our own: a tragedy, out of our hands, depicting someone who might not look like us. Perhaps it’s more difficult to watch when we realize the unthinkable story of Fruitvale Station took place as recently as 2009. Maybe watching that film made members of the Academy uncomfortable, unwilling to nominate it for a major award.

The Butler, however, had all the benchmarks of the type of movie the Academy would regularly reward. With beautiful cinematography, an all-star cast of actors both black and white, social commentary on the 1960s and 70s, and a true story about mistakes made by white people set right again by more white people. So why did Lee Daniels get snubbed?

My prejudice was no factor in thoroughly enjoying The Butler from beginning to end. Based very loosely on a true story, much like American Hustle, The Butler tells the story of Cecil Gaines, a White House domestic servant, as he leads his life and family through the tumultuous 20th century and the early years of the 21st.

Unfortunately for history fans, the most intriguing angle of The Butler was a complete Hollywood concoction. In order to show the changing social conditions in the United States from the 1950s to the current millennium, the movie also follows the story of Cecil’s son, Louis, as he joins the Civil Rights movement, the Black Panthers, and later, the Democratic Party as a nominee for Congress. Unfortunately, Louis Gaines was never a real person.

Eugene Allen, the man upon whom Cecil was based, was an actual White House butler for over 34 years. But unlike Cecil, Allen only had one son, who fought in and survived Vietnam. The character of Cecil is the father of two children, with the younger boy leaving to fight in Vietnam during the course of the movie. Still, these sorts of liberties are taken in many movies and can’t possibly be held up as an excuse for snubbing the film when American Hustle followed the same formula.

Obviously, not every movie can be nominated for Best Picture. Still, it seems like a slight against these two magnificent movies that neither was nominated when realistic stories about white men, like Nebraska and Captain Phillips, received their recognition from the Academy.

I am not arguing that either Lee Daniels’ The Butler or Fruitvale Station deserves to be awarded Best Picture. Neither was on the same level as 12 Years a Slave. Both movies, however, certainly deserve to be recognized ahead of some of the other Best Picture nominees.

While I don’t believe the Academy made malicious, racist decisions, I have to conclude that the slights given to these two movies were based on a subconscious prejudice that influences all of us. The diverse perspectives that can be brought together when a group of about 6,000 people vote on the best films of the year should counterbalance those prejudices. But that outcome is impossible when the Academy is 94 percent white, 77 percent male, and very old.

aj-lee

Wrestling network chance for Divas to make moolah

In this week’s edition of “A Feminist Sensibility,” we are talking about the world of professional wrestling. During the course of this article, I focus on WWE, largely because it is the brand I am most familiar with and also has the largest female roster in the world of professional wrestling.

First, a little bit of back story. My husband, brother-in-law, and many of their friends are huge WWE fans. When my husband, near the beginning of our relationship, revealed he was a WWE fan, I was astonished. I hadn’t realized that: 1) professional wrestling was still televised, and 2) grown men were fans.

Through the beginning of our relationship, I would watch the “longest running, weekly episodic show on television” in an effort to be the “cool” girlfriend. Soon after that, I was invited to a Royal Rumble pay-per-view viewing party. I was extremely overwhelmed and completely unable to contribute to conversations. I spent most of the night asking, “Who is the one in the purple underwear again?”

Fast-forward four years and I still do not consider myself a “WWE fan,” but I can at least hold a conversation about the participants and tell you who I like and dislike.

Last month, WWE once again held its annual Royal Rumble event. For my husband’s family, this is an occasion marked with pizza, celebration, games, and even prizes. I usually attend this event and lament that my favorite wrestler, Evan “Air” Bourne is nowhere to be found these days.

As I watched this year’s Royal Rumble, I was struck by the lack of female characters. Throughout the pay-per-view, the only women were an announcer and an occasional clip showcasing Stephanie McMahon, the daughter of Vince McMahon, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of WWE. Even during weekly episodes of Raw, the Divas matches are usually short, uninspired, and contain stereotypical female plot lines.

As a feminist, I’m hugely enamored with the concept of female wrestling. It should be a place where women are able to buck the traditional concepts of gender, focus on building muscle mass alongside the guys, and just wrestle. Unfortunately, the practice of female wrestling, at least in the realm of WWE, turns into a beauty contest and not an athletic event. I’m not saying a woman can’t be both beautiful and strong, because I absolutely think she can. What I am saying is that WWE seems to be more worried about the hair, makeup, and breast implants of their Divas more than actually fostering any wrestling talent they may have.

Furthermore, young female wrestlers who show talent and aptitude in the ring are often forced to take it down a notch for mass appeal. When the wrestler A.J. Lee debuted, I was extremely excited because I liked her and her persona of a nerdy, quirky, non-traditional ass-kicker. She had the potential to join the ranks of other female trailblazers in the industry, including The Fabulous Moolah and the recently departed Mae Young.

True to form for WWE, though, A.J.’s story line quickly spiraled downhill until she was just an accessory to the guys’ action. She was messing with all the male Superstars’ heads, was nearly married off, and was deemed “crazy.” I was no longer excited to see her on the screen and, in my mind, she was downgraded as “just another pretty face.”

As an aside, since I know someone will bring it up if I don’t, let’s talk about the Divas’ skimpy outfits for just a moment. Let me be clear: I have zero problems with the outfits the Divas wear in the ring. This is one instance where I think the men and women are truly equal. The men wear outfits that are just as revealing, and at this point, it’s not about objectification of the body, but more about showing the athleticism of those in the ring. So an occasional boob pops out, but there’s no difference between the guys who ogle Summer Rae and me hoping that I get a glimpse of Christian’s tush.

It is easy to blame the lackluster Divas division on the man at the top of the company. Perhaps the lack of creativity isn’t entirely Vince McMahon’s fault, though. It may just be a reflection of wrestling fans at-large, and that is the conversation we need to be having to change the dynamics.

During the Royal Rumble main event last month, the “WWE Universe” was extremely upset that Daniel Bryan was not a participant in the 30-man battle royal. At the reveal of the final Rumble entrant, the mostly male crowd started chanting, “We want Divas!” The chant was an insult aimed at the organizers and writers. The implication: the inevitability of Batista winning the match was so bad that even watching Divas wrestle would have been a more appealing option.

As a woman watching the Royal Rumble, I was insulted by the “We want Divas” chant. You are damn right I wanted Divas, but not because I was unsatisfied by the Royal Rumble match, but because when I’m watching WWE, I’d like to see something I can relate to (and no, Total Divas is not the answer). I understand WWE has to be extremely careful about putting men and women in the ring together. I’m absolutely certain the last thing McMahon wants to see on-screen in the contemporary, PG-rated version of WWE is a male wrestler beating up a female wrestler, creating a visual representation of domestic violence. But that isn’t to say the current path of WWE is “female friendly.”

If there is one thing I can give McMahon credit for, it is his ability to see how things can change in the future. One of the reasons WWE has been so successful as a company is largely due to McMahon’s ability to see the potential of a nationwide cable television audience before anyone else. What’s more is he’s proving his business savvy once again with the creation of the WWE Network, which debuted yesterday.

I believe McMahon and company have a chance to change my mind and possibly even turn me into a “fan.” With the new network, WWE has a unique opportunity to expand and experiment with what would attract (and keep) a feminist audience. As a first step, I would suggest WWE actually try to employ a female writer (or two, but let’s not get too radical) for the network, since there aren’t any in the company as of now.

I also believe there are men out there who would enjoy a more robust Divas division. I believe this because I watch wrestling with some of these men, and these men send money to McMahon on a regular basis. This is why, even if McMahon doesn’t share my Feminist Sensibility, I hold out hope that he will see the error of his ways when it comes to the Divas and will work with some female creative writers to make the Divas division the best thing it possibly can be — and make some money while he’s at it.

So Mr. McMahon, if you are reading this, please give me a call. I’d love to be the first female creative writer for you, and I’ve got a lot of great ideas on how to make the Divas brand soar.

kansas-house

Welcome to Kansas: Gays need not apply

I don’t have a problem with homophobes. Some of my friends are homophobes. And while I don’t agree with their lifestyle choice, it’s not my place to judge others, even if what they’re doing is an affront to everything I believe in. As far as I’m concerned, they can hate whomever they want as long as they don’t try any of that with me.

And please, just don’t do it in public. I don’t want to have to explain to my (theoretical) kids why you are behaving in such a disgraceful way.

I understand it’s tough to be a homophobe in this day and age. It seems like the world is against you, constantly telling you how your way of thinking is immoral and wrong. You are being persistently attacked for feelings that are beyond your control when all you are trying to do is exercise your Constitutional right to express those feelings.

And now you have to worry about these anti-homophobic laws that are making their ways through legislatures across the world. Will you be legally persecuted just for being anti-gay? Certainly, we can’t have that in America.

Well, fear not, my friend. Kansas has heard your cry and the representatives of the people have taken steps to create a safe haven for other homophobes like you. The state’s House of Representatives last week passed a bill that would allow you and your business to express your views by denying services to the gays who offend your delicate sensibilities. If you see two men together and find yourself feeling uncontrollable feelings, you can simply tell these men to stop acting without concern for other people and kick them out.

I understand. You are the victim. Your rights to freedom of expression need to be upheld. No one should be allowed to prevent you from being who you are. It’s just a good thing you were able to stop this before Big Government started passing laws like the Nazis, preventing you from being served at public places or from getting good jobs because of who you are and what you believe. I mean, seriously, that would be just about the most authoritarian, fascistic, Hitler-esque thing one could do.

***

Satire aside, I do know people I honestly consider to be friends who might object to this message because they don’t agree with marriage equality or a military that does not discriminate based on sexual orientation, and that’s fine. I’m never going to change their minds, and I respect their right to hold to their positions. I even accept that some folks whom I genuinely esteem believe being gay is a sin. I disagree, but I can appreciate our differences.

The problem I have is with the victim mentality. People who disagree about marriage equality can have a civil debate. But to say that there exists some kind of nefarious homosexual agenda that aims to subjugate good Christians is an absurd lie. Many people who are gay, including friends of mine, are Christians themselves, and would never want to see their faiths harmed. They are also American and love our country because it allows them to be who they are without having to worry about government-sponsored actions detrimental to their well-being.

Most Americans, no matter where they fall on the left-right spectrum, can agree on a basic principle: we should be allowed as many freedoms and liberties as possible without hindering the rights of other human beings. Your right to call someone a demon or subhuman is just as valid as my right to say you have beautiful eyes. However, your right to kill is not more important than someone else’s right to live.

This precept holds true in civil rights as well. You have every right to hate me for being different than you, but you have no right to hurt me because of that hatred. Your problems with people who are different from you are your own and cannot be legislated — and certainly not under the guise of “religious liberty” that only applies to your own interpretation of religion.

Stop fearing the “gay agenda.” The only agenda anyone is pushing is for civil rights. Nothing that is being advocated by the LGBT community and its allies will infringe on your rights in any way. You will still have the right to hate whomever you want, and you will still have the right to be treated like a human wherever you go.

The anti-gay agenda, however, is about taking away rights, not granting them. And Republicans in the Kansas House tried to take a huge step in advancing that restrictive agenda. Thankfully, the president of the Kansas Senate has put the bill on ice. If she had not, men and women who are gay would be treated differently for who they are and whom they love. That would be someone’s “right” to hate trumping another person’s right to live, and that is wrong.

A law like the one proposed in Kansas cannot stand and would not pass even simple Constitutional scrutiny, despite what Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia would inevitably say. State law cannot violate the U.S. Constitution. In the end, a discriminatory law like this would prove a huge favor to gay rights advocates; its striking-down would set a precedent to be called upon in all future cases.

Some of you will disagree with me. I’m glad you will. We all need to have our views challenged. I welcome the debate, and I look forward to hearing from you.

jane-austen

‘A Feminist Sensibility’: What a feminist looks like

This will come as no shock to those who know me: I am, and always have been, a feminist. I spent my high school and college years fighting loudly against gender stereotypes and injustices, either real or perceived. Although I’m much more reserved in my feminism now, I still look at the world through a feminist lens, and I think it is vitally important to provide a feminist voice in every hot debate.

I’ve decided to bring that perspective here to Curiata.com. Each week, I’ll be spending some time discussing one of a myriad of topics — pop culture, news, sports, and even fashion — from a feminist point of view. Most of my colleagues here consider themselves feminists (even the boys), and I’m hoping they may even chime in every once in a while on a topic that I’m just not as familiar with.

So, let’s get started with a fundamental question: What is feminism? There are a lot of definitions and conceptions out there; however, I think the simplest (and best) explanation is straight out of Merriam-Webster: feminism is “the belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities.”

It is important to note what that definition does not say. Not all feminists are man-haters, nor do we think we should run the planet (although, a planet run by a fem-puter Bea Arthur might be fun!). Being a feminist is far more complicated than world domination.

As a feminist, I believe that if a man wants to take six or more weeks of paternity leave after the birth of a child, he should be afforded the opportunity to do so.

As a feminist, I believe we have an obligation to continue to work to break the glass ceiling and close the pay gap.

As a feminist, I believe a woman is no more or less of a woman whether or not she decides to get married (to either a man or another woman).

As a feminist, I believe a woman is no more or less of a woman whether or not she decides to have children.

As a feminist, I believe if a woman chooses to have children, she should not be obligated to stay at home nor obligated to return to work, but rather be able to choose the path that is the best fit for her.

As a feminist, I believe I have an obligation to educate others on the status of women in other countries. Whether it is an easy topic to talk about, like the fact that approximately only 15 percent of females in Afghanistan can read and write, or a topic that can be stomach-turning, like the fact that approximately 90 percent of women in Eritrea will suffer female genital mutilation. Ignoring the mistreatment of women in other countries will not do anyone a bit of good.

As a feminist, I wear makeup, high heels, and dresses.

As a feminist, I wear jeans, a t-shirt, and sneakers.

As a feminist, I drink wine.

As a feminist, I drink beer.

As a feminist, I drink Scotch.

As a feminist, I drink … well, you get the picture.

These are just a taste of the feminist beliefs that make up my worldview, to whet your appetite for the discussions we’ll have in the coming weeks. I’m excited to begin this column and to have you join me every week for a little fun feminism.

I want this to be a conversation; please feel free to share your thoughts on anything I bring up in the comments below. I do, however, have one request: no name calling. I’m not just talking to the “anti-feminists” of the world. There is a sentiment within some parts of the feminist movement that engages in calling out women who are “not feminist enough.” That has got to stop.

Feminists are working toward the same ends, and it will be a lot easier (and much more peaceful) to cross that finish line if we work together. And even though we may never see true equal rights for men and women around the globe during our lifetimes, I believe the kinder we are to one another, the more likely we are to achieve this goal.

With that out of the way, I hope you’ll join me next Tuesday for my first “real” feminist column. It may seem an unlikely place to start, but if you knew the men in my life, you’d understand why I feel compelled to explore the male-dominated world of … professional wrestling!

vd-sucks

Valentine’s Day a sham; no one really likes it

Does anyone really enjoy Valentine’s Day? Sure, you may think you do, and you may remember some amazing moments in the past, but did any one of those moments surpass your hopes?

If you answered yes, then you are certainly in the minority, because despite what we all want to believe, very few people — married, dating, or single — end up happy at the end of February 14.

Let’s start with the obvious. Single people hate Valentine’s Day. This day that is supposed to be celebrating the martyrdom of a Catholic Saint has turned into a greeting card holiday about expressing your undying love for that “one person” in your life. To single folks, that means a stark reminder once a year that you are alone and no one loves you. Great.

Single Valentine’s Days are the worst. If you are recently single, the day reminds you of your lost opportunities. You sit alone, watching you ex’s favorite romantic comedy, eating Ben and Jerry’s, wondering what you could have done better.

If you’ve been single for a while, like I have, you spend the entire day trying to figure out how your life got so sad that you spend your nights watching anime, hoping the kung fu god and the demon-hunting vampire will finally get together. You are left with a crushing feeling of emptiness as you wonder what it is about you that just is not good enough, while you know that plenty of the worst kinds of people are out for steak dinners and wine.

This feeling of self-doubt is usually a bogus one, too. If you love who you are and where you are in life, why does it matter if no one else sees what makes you great?

People often tell me that I need to lower my standards. Why? I’m not looking for a rocket scientist/supermodel with an encyclopedic knowledge of Batman stories. But what is so wrong with wanting a person who understands me and accepts me and is attractive to me? We should not have to settle for somebody who doesn’t make us happy.

So, if you are spending Valentine’s Day alone, drinking Captain Morgan and watching Clerks 2, just remember that it’s better than being out with someone you don’t like, trying desperately to make him or her happy, even though you know deep in your heart that you just don’t care.

I have been single for the past four Valentine’s Days. Obviously, that must say something about me. I get it. I can be pretty abrasive and very self-assured. But that certainly wasn’t always the case.

There was a time when my smugness was just an outer shell, and I was looking for someone with whom I could share the world. Valentine’s Day was the day every year when all I wanted was to be with someone and to show her how much I cared. Of course, that doesn’t make any sense. Why would I want to be with someone just so I could tell her how much she mattered on one particular day each year? Doesn’t it make more sense to actually fall in love with someone and spend a day of your choosing devoted to showing that person how special he or she is to you? Valentine’s Day acts as a constraint for some relationships in order to fulfill some false sense of what should be.

And then there are the couples. While I’m sure millions of couples have sweet Valentine’s dates with each other, how many of those dates have at least one person wondering, “Is this it?” Do these sweet dates of restaurants and movies ever truly measure up to what we expect when February 14 rolls around?

One of the few times I was actually in a relationship on Valentine’s Day, my then-girlfriend asked me what I wanted for the holiday. I, of course, trying to be sweet, answered that all I wanted was time with her. My girlfriend, sarcastic human being that she is, got me a clock and a picture of her. Time. With her. Just what I asked for.

It was brilliant. It was funny. It was completely clever and I was so frustrated by it. Not because I wanted a gift or because I didn’t laugh, but because I actually just wanted to spend time with this girl. Unfortunately, we were busy people and we really were unable to spend any time together for the holiday, so I spent the day angry.

A lot of people share stories of disappointment with Cupid’s favorite day. The problem is that we all have ridiculous hopes for what is supposed to happen, our realities shattered by John Hughes movies and every season finale of Glee. Even those among us who know not to expect much will still hold out hope that, somehow, things will change and our own romantic comedy will begin.

For those of you who are married, I first offer my respect. Marriage is difficult and requires a lot of sacrifice. But for wedded couples who are in a rut, Valentine’s Day is a painful reminder of a love whose romance has waned after years of living together, paying bills and raising kids. Sure, there are always exceptions, but I have to believe they are rare.

Marriage is obviously a different animal than young love. Marriage, when done right, is an evolving love, uniting two partners whose shared experiences will forever bind them even if their romantic feelings fade into oblivion. And for 364 days a year, that evolving love is enough. However, Valentine’s Day is the one day each year when even the happiest couples are left wanting more. They want to have a romantic dinner and a memorable night ending with fireworks and lovemaking like neither has never experienced. That won’t happen. That doesn’t happen.

In theory, Valentine’s Day is a wonderful thing. We should take a moment to tell our significant others how much we love them. Perhaps designating one day a year to this task is helpful for the aloof among us.

The problem with this holiday is only in the heightened expectations, driven by works of fiction, that destroy the beauty of those true moments of actual love between two individuals. We see so many last-minute confessions and public displays of affection that simply lying on a couch holding each other is not enough on the most romantic holiday of the year. And those of us who spend the day alone just wish we had someone to hold.

If you have someone to spend Valentine’s Day with this year, I hope you enjoy yourself. Treat each other well, and make sure you remember that this is the real world and not a Nicholas Sparks novel. Love each other for who you are, not what you want your partner to be.

Those of us who are likely to spend the day alone will be sad. But don’t worry about us. There’s always Netflix.

At the 'Supernatural' fan convention

‘Fanning Out’: For fanboys and fangirls of all stripes

Nerds, geeks, countrymen: we live in a very fortunate time. For years, we were looked down on, bullied, and made fun of. Not anymore. Now we are part of mainstream pop culture.

Television shows like Doctor Who, The Walking Dead, and Game of Thrones are extremely popular. Chris Hardwick, Zachary Levi, and Nathan Fillion are beloved by fans everywhere because they’re nerds. Also? Nerds now look like Chris Hardwick, Zachary Levi, and Nathan Fillion. (And for the guys, Mila Kunis used to be a big World of Warcraft gamer until too many people started figuring out her screen name.)

One of the best parts of nerd culture is the ability to be fangirls and fanboys. Not to be mistaken with a mere fan, these fanboys and fangirls — I’ll call them fan*s — go above and beyond in their excitement over the things they love. I’m an unabashed fangirl myself, and I’d like to welcome all my fellow fan*s to this space, where we are Fanning Out all we want.

But just what is a fan*? The world’s authority on all things slang defines a “fanboy” as “a passionate fan of various elements of geek culture (e.g. sci-fi, comics, Star Wars, video games, anime, hobbits, Magic: the Gathering, etc.), but who lets his passion override social graces.” Not the most flattering portrayal, but probably not wrong either.

The definition for “fangirl” is similar, but with a more judgmental tone: “Fangirls congregate at anime conventions and livejournal. Have been known to glomp, grope, and tackle when encountering said obesessions.” [sic]

Considering the author of this entry can’t even spell “obsessions” correctly, I’m going to try not to be too offended by his or her suggestion that, for some reason, being a fangirl is obsessive while being a fanboy is just passion. Boys are just as capable of being obsessive as girls. But I digress.

The truth is, we all have a little fan* in us. You can deny it all you want, but we are all passionate about something, whether it’s television, movies, music, art, books — there’s always something. Not sure whether you’re just a normal fan or a full-fledged fan*? See if you can sympathize with any of the statements below.

You might be a fan* if …

  1. You’re still disappointed you didn’t receive an owl with your acceptance to Hogwarts when you turned 11 (even if you turned 11 years before Harry Potter existed). It’s similar to the disappointment you felt when you realized that old wardrobe at your grandparents’ didn’t lead to another world, or that police box isn’t really bigger on the inside (but you keep checking both just in case).
  2. You have a definite opinion on who is the best captain: Kirk, Picard, Reynolds, Harkness, or Sparrow. And are prepared to debate your opinion at any given time. The same goes for which ship is better: the Enterprise, Serenity, Moya, the Millennium Falcon … Let’s not even get into the argument about which Enterprise is better.
  3. The mere thought of not getting your tickets to Comic-Con makes you hyperventilate. No joke: that episode of The Big Bang Theory a couple weeks ago? I know several people who have admitted that is their worst nightmare; one friend even said she turned the show off and couldn’t watch until after the real Comic-Con badges went on sale and she knew she was going.
  4. You’ve ever designed your own shirt/sign/poster for an event, hoping your favorite celebrity in attendance will notice you. This may sound like a shameless call for attention to some, but take it from me: it works. Also, if you meet this celebrity more than once with similarly designed shirts, they just might remember you.
  5. You’ve waited more than an hour for an autograph/photo/handshake/hug/brief sighting. I’ve done this numerous times and don’t regret it at all. Except maybe that one time when we could have been watching Vanilla Ice and instead stood outside praying for a glimpse of Donnie Wahlberg (and all we got was Nick Lachey).
  6. You have dreamed about the exact conversation you would have upon meeting your favorite celebrity … but, when that day arrives, all you can manage is a breathless, “Hi.”
  7. You’re completely comfortable with your sexuality and aren’t afraid to admit you have crushes on celebs of both sexes. I mean, who doesn’t love Jennifer Lawrence? And Daryl Dixon, Agent Melinda May, or the Winchesters?
  8. You’ve been honing your paintball and/or chair-walking skills just in case you need them when least expected — like in the middle of study hall.
  9. You know that a “ship” is so much more than a vessel that floats on water. And they have names like Caskett and Klaine. And you spend half your time wondering if these ships will ever sail. And desperately hope they will.
  10. Tumblr.
  11. The word “Reichenbach” reduces you to the fetal position with your thumb in your mouth.
  12. You own or have read/seen/listened to everything your favorite celebrity has ever done. This includes sitting in front of your computer for several hours, watching episode after episode of the British sitcom Suburban Shootout on YouTube because Tom Hiddleston. And who else has downloaded the soundtrack for August: Osage County solely for Benedict Cumberbatch? (You’re really dedicated if you watched Breaking Dawn — Part 2 just for Lee Pace.)
  13. “Carry On Wayward Son” will always hold a special place in your heart.
  14. You’ve ever attended the midnight screening/release of a movie, book, DVD, video game, or anything else. Bonus points if you’ve actually dressed up in costume for one of these events. Sports fans, don’t think you’re exempt here. Showing up early to a game to tailgate, with faces and chests painted, wearing every item of clothing in your team’s colors you can possibly find — that’s the equivalent of going to the midnight premiere of The Hobbit dressed as a hobbit.
  15. You understand the meaning of terms like “squee,” “feels,” “OTP,” and the aforementioned “ship.”

If you’ve reached the end of this list and you’ve been nodding along with any or all of these points, then you’re probably a fan* whether you like it or not. And this list just scratches the surface.

If you’ve discovered that perhaps you are one of us, keep in mind there’s nothing to be ashamed of. As one of the characters from the show Leverage used to say, it’s “the age of the geek.” So embrace your inner nerd and enjoy the ride. Trust me, it’s a lot more fun once you give into it.

And don’t forget to come back here weekly as I’ll be discussing TV, books, movies — all the things that are worth Fanning Out for. Until next time, “May the odds be ever in your favor.”

summoners

I got 99 protagonists, but a woman ain’t one

I’m a white man. I should probably get that out of the way up front. Now, then:

Women and non-white folk get short shrift in all manner of media. Time after time, they are relegated to support characters and trophies. When, after all, was the last time you watched a feature film in which the primary protagonist was a black female? There’s Precious … uhhh, Catwoman … oh, and that Disney frog movie. (She’s a frog for half of it, but that still counts.) I am having a lot of trouble thinking of others.

In video games, though, the problem is even worse. Most games don’t have playable female characters. Of those that do, the females are usually one or two choices out of a dozen characters (see fighting games), and/or their only real purpose is to feature in one or another state of undress on the cover of the game box. There are, of course, notable exceptions. I could talk about Mirror’s Edge, Metroid Prime, or Ittle Dew, but they are diamonds in the rough. And make no mistake, there’s a lot of rough.

I get ads on Facebook for online games that warn, “Males only allowed,” and show CGI girls thrusting their hoo-has at me in improbable poses. In video games, female armor seems to cover up, on average, about one-fifth as much of their torsos as male armor does. Women in games are constantly getting kidnapped (to spur a man’s rescue quest), murdered (to spur a man’s revenge quest), or just bartered around between male characters like a used lawn chair at a yard sale.

Make a game starring a woman, “they” say, and you’re shooting yourself in the foot financially. (“They” say the same thing about women in movies.) Males play video games, and they won’t buy a game that forces them to play as a woman.

Never mind that women did 45 percent of the gaming in 2013. Never mind that women gamers over age 18 outnumber male gamers under 18 by a factor of 3-to-2 (even if many of those women are, in fact, your mom, who likes to play Words With Friends with people from her high school graduating class … or from your high school graduating class, for that matter).

What “they” say creates a self-perpetuating cycle in which certain kinds of games turn away women because they aren’t represented, and then the game developers are told not to cater their games to women because women don’t buy them.

Marketing zooms in on specific demographics, I get that. The pink aisle is for girls and the black/blue/white/brown/grey/red/green/yellow aisles are for boys. If you can sell more units by indulging your target demographic’s prejudiced and misogynistic tendencies, then gods bless you, you big damn hero of the free market.

OK, now that I’m done ranting, I want to bring up another point that’s sort of been missing from this particular conversation. Even if women made up 0 percent of the gaming population — if something about that mysterious “woman gene” inured them to the sweet, sweet lure of pixelated, interactive media — even then: Why shouldn’t games be made by women, featuring actual female protagonists, with actual feminine perspectives, solely for the sake of the male gamers who would play them?

Perhaps it is because there is a stigma about male gamers playing games as female characters. In many recent games, particularly in MMOs like World of Warcraft and western RPGs such as Mass Effect, where players are permitted to choose dialog options in social situations, it’s become common practice to allow gamers to choose their own gender. Sometimes women play these games with the male option. Sometimes men play them with the female option. Many reasons are cited, ranging from, “If I have to stare at someone’s butt for hours on end, I might as well stare at one I find attractive,” to, “I like the female voice actor better,” but not many of us male gamers are very comfortable telling non-gamers (and sometimes even other gamers) that we enjoy playing as female characters.

For example, I played a game relatively recently called Fortune Summoners: Secret of the Elemental Stones, a game in which the protagonist is a tomboyish 12-year-old who kills monsters with her sword and makes friends with her schoolmates. I absolutely adored the game, but almost everyone I talk to about it looks at me funny. You, dear reader, are quite possibly looking at me funny right now, I shouldn’t wonder.

I’m no pervy old man who gets off on watching underage girls swing “swords” around, all right? The truth is, there’s not much difference between playing a game with a certain protagonist and watching a movie or reading a book about one. Why should I be ashamed of playing Fortune Summoners, but not of watching Pan’s Labyrinth, or reading A Tree Grows in Brooklyn?

I shouldn’t be.

I can watch Pan’s Labyrinth and strongly empathize with the plight of a brave, creative young girl trying to survive the harsh reality of living in a household surrounded by violence. I can read A Tree Grows in Brooklyn and cheer along young Francie Nolan as she struggles to thrive in a society that’s determined to push her down into “her place.” I love these stories. I love that they come from a fresh perspective, one that happens to be so different from my own. Both of them have contributed to my personal and moral growth as a human being.

So in sum, I absolutely want games with well-fleshed-out, interesting female characters for women gamers (who deserve them greatly, though I will let them speak for themselves on the matter), but I also want those games for me. And, for that matter, for my fellow male gamers, who on the whole (and especially among the 12-17-year-old demographic) could probably use the education.

The final paragraph of this article has been modified since its original publication.