Category Archives: relationships

obx-14

Vacationing with kids: It gets better with age

This Martial Mama and her brood have just returned from a week in the Outer Banks, North Carolina. We and several extended family members (12 adults, seven kids, and one dog, in all) rented a spacious, near-the-beach house. Now, my husband and I have only had kids for just under a decade, so what future parenting trials we may undergo are, as yet, unknown to us. However, after a week with kids and parents in various stages, I have some insights about vacationing with wee ones.

Our kids are 6 and 9 years old. On this vacation, they got themselves dressed and fed themselves — the 9-year-old even got her own breakfast together. They helped pick up messes, generally hung out with us, and then pretty much entertained themselves. The other kids on this trip included my half-brother’s two kids (ages 7 and 8), my half-sister’s 5-month-old twin boys (adorable!), and my cousin’s 15-month-old son.

Going to the beach involved setting up our base camp — a bevy of umbrellas, tents, blankets, coolers, and beach toys — before everyone settled in to enjoy the beach. For my husband and me, this meant playtime in the waves with both kids, then a continuation of ocean time for my husband and son, while our daughter dug a “sand trap” a few feet away and I cracked open a book.

As I was reading and keeping half an eye on our daughter, I became aware of my cousin having to constantly manage her 15-month-old. Obviously, this is totally appropriate and necessary on account of how busy toddlers are and how dangerous a huge, surging sea can be for someone who is approximately 22 inches tall, has no fear, and thinks he can swim.

But, as I was reading my book, my cousin said to her son, “Look at Aunt Jenn.” (Technically, I’m his first cousin once removed, but “aunt” is more practical, given the 30-plus-year age gap). “Just look how relaxed she is. She’s reading a book. I would love to just read a book!”

This made me smile as I looked up and saw her, yet again, making a move to keep her little human tornado safe. Then she said to me, “I know, I know … you’ve earned it!”

I told her that, in fact, this was really the first vacation we’ve taken since having kids that we could sort of relax and enjoy ourselves. And I remembered well when our kids were toddlers, how we were never able to just sit down. I also told her that, naturally, this would be the case for her, too, and she could read a book in just a few years. (And, while I didn’t say it out loud, I have earned it!)

My husband and I have experienced five stages of traveling with kids. The infant stage, in my opinion, is one of the easiest times. Sure, babies wake up more frequently at night and sometimes they cry but they also sleep a lot, stay where you put them, and don’t generally care where they are as long as they are fed, changed, and held. This stage might be a little more challenging for parents who bottle-feed, but nursing moms have it easy in this regard. Plus, if you travel with family or close friends, they won’t be able to keep their hands off of a baby, so you will have some free time between feedings and changings.

The toddler stage, unfortunately for my cousin right now, is probably one of the most challenging times to travel with kids. I am pretty sure toddlers cry more than infants because they are constantly hearing the word “No.” They do care where they are, and they require a lot of gear, which they don’t have to carry, pack, and remember. If you forget a critical item (a lovey, special spoon, music box, etc.), your toddler will remember, and the rest of your trip will be much less enjoyable. And don’t even think about trying to buy a replacement, because your toddler will know. Also, no matter if you are home or away, during the toddler stage, you are a prisoner to the morning and afternoon naps. So, spending a whole day anywhere away from a sleeping space is out of the question.

The preschool stage is fun if you go to a super-kid-friendly place. (But not too much of a kid-friendly place, like anywhere that your preschoolers will have to wait excessively long to enjoy an activity. If they have to wait and watch other kids having fun, you are pretty much guaranteed a meltdown of epic proportions.) At this stage, a morning nap may be a thing of the past, but the afternoon nap is still critical. So, during this phase, plan to get to things early, and plan to leave before nap time. This is usually a stage when you can go out to (an early) dinner pretty much anywhere, excluding very formal or fancy restaurants. My point is, just because you have toddlers, you are not restricted to Friendly’s or McDonald’s for your dining needs.

Traveling with young kids (ages 5 to 7) gets even easier. Even though young kids may have an earlier bedtime, naps are probably totally gone by now. You can go to places you enjoy, as long as you keep extended stops to a minimum (no pondering that blank canvas at the Museum of Modern Art for longer than 15 seconds) and keep your kid(s) engaged. Talk to them about the things they are seeing, and ask them focused questions. For instance, instead of saying, “Isn’t this cool?!” you might try, “What would you paint on this blank canvas?” Young kids aren’t going to have the stamina or the patience that you have for your interests, but they tend to be tolerant. It is wise, during this time, to try and schedule some kid-friendly activities in between your antique hunting and gallery gazing.

obx-sunrise

My husband and I are now in the full-fledged “Traveling with Kids” stage, which I would categorize as involving children between the ages of 7 and 12-ish. Our son is on the very bottom of this age range (almost 7) and our daughter is nearing age 10. They are joys to travel with. They are extremely tolerant of long car rides. When they are sick of talking to us, they will draw, read a book, watch a movie, or play games on their Kindles. It took us 12 hours to drive home from our vacation this year, and I can tell you that the kids did way better than I did! Traveling, to them, is a grand adventure.

Our kids enjoy museums, tours, and sightseeing a whole lot more than they did a few years ago. They understand things, make connections, and ask questions. Also, they are far more likely to stop and really experience something before feeling the need to run to the next fun thing. There actually were a few times on this trip when we got bored with something before the kids did, and that is definitely a first for us.

I’m not going to lie — it is easier to travel with kids who can pull their own luggage and read to themselves. But traveling with any kid, big or small, while it maybe not as leisurely as it was before kids, can be a really fun experience, too. And it might not be as bad as you think.

giving-tree

Why I hate The Giving Tree by Shel Silverstein

Reading books has always been one of my favorite pastimes. One of the most positive aspects of my own childhood was having a variety of books at my disposal. Someone, usually my grandmother, would see that I got to the library every two weeks during summer breaks, and I could borrow as many books as I could carry. On my birthday, Easter, and Christmas, I could expect to receive many books as gifts.

Not only did I have access to books, but I also had good reading role models. My grandparents always spend their evenings reading. My grandfather favors nonfiction, especially political analyses and biographies. My grandmother prefers mystery novels.

My dad spent many hours reading to me as a child. I loved how he would change his voice for each character. He has always spent days when it is either too hot or too cold to be outside with a book in his hands. He especially loves Larry McMurtry and historical fiction set in the time of the fur-trading mountain man.

In the summers, I would spend some weekends with my aunt and cousin. My aunt would usually take us to the public pool and, when we were tired of the water, we would rest on her big blanket and listen as she read us The Hobbit.

For myself, I prefer novels and historical fiction, though I do read nonfiction and biographies on topics and people who interest me. Long before I had kids, I knew that I would want to develop in them a love of books and reading. When I was expecting my first child, many books were given to me as gifts. Among them were classics from Beatrix Potter, plus Goodnight Moon, Where the Wild Things Are, whimsical books by Eric Carle and Sandra Boynton, and Shel Silverstein’s The Giving Tree.

For the beginning part of my first child’s young life, most of our time was spent with short and sweet books made out of fabric or board, which could survive near-constant exposure to baby gums and baby drool. But, after a while, I thought we’d read The Giving Tree. Everyone I knew said they loved it.

So, we began to read. The book starts out well enough. A tree loves a little boy. The little boy loves the tree. He loves her shade and her leaves and her apples. He loves to spend time with her, climb, swing, and play with her. The tree is happy. The boy is happy.

And that’s where the nice story ends and the personality disorders of the two main characters are revealed.

The boy grows up and leaves the tree but returns as a young adult. The tree invites the boy to come and play, but the boy says he wants to have fun and buy things and asks the tree for money. This is red flag number one: selfish freeloader. The tree doesn’t have money, of course, but gives the boy, now a young man, all of her apples to sell. The boy does not even say thank you. So far, the tree seems to be a helpful friend, willing to give the boy the benefit of the doubt that he really isn’t a selfish freeloader. The tree is wrong.

Years go by and the boy comes back to the tree. He is sad. He again refuses the tree’s offer to play and, without so much as a “How do you do?” asks for a house. Red flag number two: narcissism. Narcissism is a personality disorder in which an individual pursues personal gratification without regard for the feelings of others. Some traits of narcissists include (but certainly are not limited to) difficulty maintaining satisfactory relationships and a lack of empathy.

Of course, the tree has no house, but she does have branches, which she gives the boy (who is now a man) in order to build himself a house. He takes the lumber and leaves, again without saying thank you! The tree is happy.

Here’s where I begin to worry about this tree, because I’m pretty sure this tree suffers from codependency. Codependency, as defined by Wikipedia, is “a psychological condition or a relationship in which a person is controlled or manipulated by another who is affected with a pathological condition (typically narcissism or drug addiction); and in broader terms, it refers to the dependence on the needs of, or control of, another. It also often involves placing a lower priority on one’s own needs, while being excessively preoccupied with the needs of others.”

The tree now has no branches, no leaves, and no apples. It’s basically alone and naked in the woods for decades when the boy, who is now a much older man, comes back. I imagine him, during this absence, having been married and divorced a minimum of three times. He probably has foreclosed on at least one house and has developed a gambling problem and an addiction to alcohol and/or street drugs. He also has had difficulty keeping a job and is estranged from all of his kids because he never really cared enough to parent them.

But return to the tree he does, and the tree is ecstatic. Did he come to thank the tree? Did he come to visit, reminisce, or play with the tree? The answer, predictably, is a big, fat NO. Now, this guy whines that he’s too old and too sad and too miserable, and he wants to sail away in a boat. (Probably to escape those persistent debt collectors and the attorneys of his three ex-wives!) The tree offers her entire trunk to this self-centered bastard and is happy about it. If I was unsure whether the tree was codependent before, I’m not anymore. The man is not too old to carry away the rest of this tree, and he presumably makes his boat and sails away. I’ll let you guess whether or not he said thank you.

Finally, when the man is old and very near death, he comes back to the tree. The tree is actually sorry that she has nothing left to offer the man except what little remains of her stump. But he uses the tree one last time as a chair, and the tree is happy.

Really!?!?!

I hate this book because it’s not a story of love and friendship. It’s not even a story about giving, as the title implies. The Giving Tree is actually a really sick tale of a horribly dysfunctional relationship. For kids.

No, thank you. If my kids are going to learn about dysfunctional relationships, it’s going to be the old-fashioned way: by watching inappropriate movies and television shows, and by the example set by their dad and me.

woman-stress

Confessions of a guilt-ridden feminist

Fans of A Feminist Sensibility will notice my radio silence over the past two weeks. Without being overly specific, my professional life has taken a little detour down Route Crazy and I’ve been spending most of what little free time I have trying to cope with this new reality.

I’m not complaining, mind you. I love my career and I’m extremely passionate about what I do. However, no matter how professionally stimulating the last two weeks have been, I’ve spent most of my time feeling guilty.

Why guilty? Well, because I have been traveling and working long hours at my job, I have been neglecting other things, like housework, time with my husband, and obligations like writing for Curiata.com. Now, being the modern urban gentleman that he is, Mike has not said one word about the dismal state of disrepair of our house, and he has, in his own way and by his own definition, done his part to keep it “clean.” He also works in the same field as I do (politics), so he understands that until the state budget is signed into law, I’m stuck working late nights.

Thankfully, even though I work long hours during the week, the weekends are my own. However, this does nothing to help the guilt factor. Last weekend, the MUG and I took our dog for a nice, four-mile jaunt in a local park that has some decent hiking trails. Instead of getting a head start on my duty to my legions of readers, I chose to spend time with my family. While I don’t regret that decision, I do, nevertheless, feel guilty that I shirked that responsibility to myself, my colleagues, and all of you.

I feel guilty for a whole host of other reasons, too — even something as menial as not making enough time in my life for fitness. I’ve always expected great things from myself, including impeccable time management skills. My mother once said to me, “Carrie, no one in this world would be as critical of you as you are of yourself. You have to learn to be kinder to yourself and let things go.” She was and is right. But learning to let go and accept that I can’t do it all is something that I still, obviously, struggle with.

In her book Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead, the chief operating officer of Facebook, Sheryl Sandberg, dedicates an entire chapter to the myth of having it all. Throughout the chapter, she regales us with stories about how she tries to balance a career and being a wife and mother. It’s stories like these that make me simultaneously feel better and worse about my frustrations. If someone like Sandberg has struggles, it’s acceptable that I do, too.

Then there’s that little voice inside my head that says, “but you don’t have kids yet … it’s only going to get worse.” And while that’s probably true, the fact remains that the childless and partnerless women in this world still struggle with the feeling of guilt. Women will either feel guilt because they don’t have a partner or children, or they’ll feel guilt because they are probably neglecting their partner and/or children in some way that is ruining their lives.

I could blame the media for inundating us with images that portray women who have it all. I could blame the advertising industry for telling us that if we just had X product, we’d be able to have it all. But in reality, while these things can influence us, they do not control us. Only I can control how I feel about things.

So from today forward, I invite all other women, whether they consider themselves feminist or not, to join me in resolving to be kinder to ourselves. I resolve to stop feeling guilty and beating myself up if I miss a workout, or dinner with my husband, or loading the dishwasher. I resolve to stop trying to “do it all” and will instead focus on “doing what I can.”

pudding-rest

First pet brings joy, lesson: How to bury a salamander

Every Memorial Day weekend, my kids, husband, and I go to my favorite place on Earth: my grandparents’ farm. The property is nearly 300 acres of wooded hills, stone walls, peace, and quiet. The land is gorgeous, of course, but the most charming asset is actually my grandparents and the rest of my dad’s family, who live in relatively close proximity.

Lots of wild animals can be seen at the farm during all seasons, but Memorial Day weekend brings a seeming migration of salamanders. They appear in great numbers in vernal ponds and intermittent streams and under rocks in shaded, muddy areas.

One of my kids’ favorite activities (OK, and mine, too!) is newt-hunting with my dad. The kids love it because they always manage to get me to let them keep one as a pet. My dad loves it because, as a man of action who cannot stand idleness, he needs to “do” something as a way of connecting with my offspring. I love it because we get to hang out with Dad/Grampa and be outside without the kids asking one time to go inside/play on their Kindles/watch TV.

And experiencing the wonder of this little adventure through the kids’ eyes is crazy amazing. They love the hunt. They love to be the first to spot a salamander. They love to pick them up and handle them gently. They love to name them and attribute all sorts of character traits to them. How they can glean emotional clues from a salamanders face, I will never know — but, who am I to argue?

We all share a belief in fairies and things unseen. (Well, we share the desire for them to be real, and we often act like they are.) So as we marvel at the little amphibians, we question who, if anyone, cares for the salamanders. Of what use might they be to the fairy villages we believe are right under our noses if only we had the magic to see them? Do salamanders pull fairy carriages? Dig their gardens? Act as Watch Newts? Nothing keeps kids busier than their imaginations, and I love to see how my kids’ creative minds are put to use.

After returning from the world of fairies, we manage to catch one or five or 17 newts and take them back to the farm in a big Tupperware container filled with grass, moss, and a bit of water. We sit on the porch and study them and see who gets peed on first, because the huge danger of newts is (aside from their mildly toxic skin) the fact that they defecate on you with surprising frequency.

The Memorial Day holiday of 2011 was our first hunt. My daughter was 5 and my son was 2. We found many newts and, after considerable begging, mostly by my dad on behalf of the kids, we took a salamander home as a pet. She (for my daughter decided our newt was a girl and named her “Pudding”) survived the two-hour drive back to our house, and we had to immediately find a pet store to acquire the necessary supplies: small aquarium, food bowl, resin rock, and some kind of fake moss. Until that moment, I hadn’t realized pet stores actually sold “Newt and Salamander Bites” as food; they, in fact, do, and so we bought some of that as well.

In theory, this type of creature is low-maintenance. Salamanders shouldn’t be handled a lot, and they don’t need to go for walks. However, their aquariums need to be kept very clean, and so every three or four days, I’d have to take out all of the contents, wash them in hot water, wipe out the container, and then replace everything. My daughter did “help,” insomuch as a 5-year-old can. But, as parents all know, it’s often just easier to do it yourself.

Things hummed along pretty smoothly over the summer and into the fall. After Halloween, though, Pudding’s skin wasn’t as moist as it had been, and she didn’t move around as much. I thought this was due to the cool temperatures in our house and the fact that Pudding may be going into a dormant winter phase. Again, not being able to extrapolate a newt’s well-being by its facial expression and body language, I was at a loss.

On the morning of November 10, 2011, I came downstairs to feed my daughter and get her ready to catch the bus to school. As usual, I went to Pudding’s container to check on her and drop in a food pellet or two. That morning, it was clear to me Pudding was dead as a doornail.

My dilemma: Do I tell my daughter immediately about this situation, or do I wait and tell her after school? She usually checked on Pudding each morning, and I didn’t want her to see the dead carcass before she had heard the news. But, if she didn’t check on her, she didn’t really need to know right then, and I could delay the emotional response until after the school day was complete. Then again, if she did notice Pudding and I hadn’t told her, she would be devastated that I had tried to hide it from her. It was pretty much a lose-lose situation, so I decided to just get it over with and tell her.

My daughter Addie came downstairs, and I told her as gently as I could that Pudding had died. Tears and sorrow came pouring out of her little body. Her first question, in between sobs, was, “Do you think she had a good death? Did she suffer?” I told her that Pudding had a good life here — probably much longer of a life than she might have had in the woods. I told her that she had taken good care of Pudding and that Pudding surely knew that Addie loved her. I told her that salamanders didn’t live more than a season, and it was just what happens to salamanders in the fall and winter. (This may not be scientifically accurate, but it was a comfort to my little one, so please feel free not to send me links on the longevity of newts.)

I sent an email to Addie’s teacher, alerting her of this sad event, just so she would be prepared. We tried to make it look like Addie had not been weeping before she got on the bus. That day at school, Addie visited the “feelings counselor” and talked to her about Pudding.

When she came home, we placed Pudding’s tissue-wrapped body in a small jewelry box with some newt bites, leaves and sticks, and a pebble on which Addie had drawn a small heart. Addie found a large, smooth rock to use as a grave marker and decorated it. We decided to bury Pudding under the rose bush in our garden. It was still flowering, so Addie picked a bloom and placed it on Pudding’s resting place. Each of us (both kids and I) shared a memory of Pudding.

And that was that.

R.I.P. Pudding
Spring 2011 — 11/10/2011

pudding-live

roman-marriage

Nice day for a green wedding: Those pricey traditions

Late spring into early summer is the perfect time for weddings. The weather is temperate and docile, the foliage is in full bloom, and potential guests have extra gift money on hand from low utility costs over the last few months.

Of course, wedding vendors the world over are well aware of these truths, and price accordingly. Between paying top dollar for the dress, the rings, the food (and cake), the venue, and the entertainment, somebody’s coming out of this process wishing it were December instead. It can’t all be lush, red roses and gorgeous, photogenic rainbows after all.

Let’s see if we can trim the fat a bit by looking at our cash-intensive traditions and where they come from. Maybe there are some things we can do without.

 

The Dress

What’s the deal with these wedding dresses, anyway? You buy one for way more than the price of any other dress you will ever own, and then you wear it one time ever. Whose bright idea was this?

As usual, we can blame Queen Victoria. When she married Prince Albert in 1840, she bucked the trends and picked white as her color, to signify purity. Shortly thereafter, it caught on, with rich women wanting to show off that they could afford a dress that would pretty much immediately be ruined if it suffered any wear or if they did any kind of work.

Most everyone does white these days, but it’s not required if you’re getting remarried (for whatever reason). In India, however, brides wear anything but white, as that’s the color of mourning, and typically go for red instead.

As to veils, these aren’t for hiding the bride’s beautiful face from the groom, but rather from evil spirits. Roman brides, along with their five witnesses (bridesmaids), wore veils and identical dress so as to confuse the dastardly spirits that might want to steal away her fertility at the moment she passes from the protection of her father to that of her husband.

When it comes to the bride adorning herself with something old, new, borrowed, and blue, this superstition seems to be related to protecting oneself from the evil eye. The evil eye, wielded at times even by an unknowing practitioner of the dark arts, is a widespread cultural myth, which in our contemporary society has been diminished to the less-malevolent “stink eye.”

Anyway, it was common practice for everyone to have something blue on them, to avoid the curses of the eye, which might cause things to dry up (like wells or, in the case of weddings, reproductive organs). The “something borrowed” really should, by tradition, be the undergarments of a woman who has already given birth, so they can confer her fertility to the new bride. We also typically leave off the final line of the poem, “and a silver sixpence in her shoe.” Silver, of course, doubles as a powerful aphrodisiac (not really) and werewolf deterrent.

The Rings

The first engagement rings were probably invented by the Egyptians, while the Romans made them popular. Roman men wore rings of iron to indicate that they were citizens. Giving such a ring to a bride-to-be would indicate that she was now “like people.” Romans believed the left ring finger (named after, y’know, where you wear your wedding ring) contained a vein (or sinew) that led straight to the heart. This idea is either delightful or creepy, depending on your perspective, I guess.

The Cake

More Roman origins. These Romans are popping up everywhere, I swear. In ancient Rome, the priest class, known as Flamen, got married by eating a cake made of spelt, a kind of wheat, in a ceremony called “confarreatio,” which basically means “eating spelt.” In medieval Europe, cakes were stacked up high, and if the bride and groom could kiss over their cake, they would have a long and happy marriage. Sucks to be short, I guess.

The Entertainment

In the United States, we hire a DJ or a band and get a second cousin who plays the viola to perform at the ceremony. Then people dance, or not, as the mood takes them. We have first dances, parental dances, money dances, ridiculous group dances like the Chicken Dance, Electric Slide, Macarena, the Hora if you’re Jewish, that terrible clapping, stepping, cha cha thing, and I’ve even seen the Hokey Pokey once or twice. Maybe some other cultural traditions can help us out here, to give us some more variety, at least.

In Ethiopia, the wedding day starts with the groom and his friends going to the bride’s house and forcing their way inside through the bride’s relatives while loudly singing. The “best man” then sprays perfume everywhere inside. Why yes, yes, it is an overt metaphor for sex.

How about Germany, where bride kidnapping is the norm, which you may recognize from The Office. The groomsmen take the bride bar-hopping, leaving clues behind, while the groom follows after them and pays their tabs. Hmm … that doesn’t really sound less expensive than the overpriced DJ.

In Romania, the lăutari (“lutists”) follow the couple around all day, playing specific songs to fit the moment, and act as entertainer/emcee/event organizer all in one.

The Ceremony

In the United States, the ceremony is most often going to be a Christian one, performed in a church. We have special music, ring exchanging, vows, probably a brief sermon, and then people throw rice at the married couple. Also, there are unity candles these days. What is the deal with those, anyway? Like, people aren’t content with the half-dozen existing symbols for unity inherent in the wedding service, like the rings, the joining of hands, the kiss … they also need something that’s blatantly called a “unity” candle? I’ll get over it.

Maybe you’ve also seen a Celtic-style rite called handfasting? The word “fast” comes from Proto-Germanic fastuz (“firm”). We have three definitions for the word, which carry very different meanings, but they all happen to share this root. You can be a fast runner (or a “firm” runner). You can fast to skip meals or other desired things (or hold “firm” against temptation), then break your fast by eating breakfast. You can also fasten two things together, which is the meaning implicit in handfasting. The rite involves wrapping a hand each of the bride and groom together with cloth to symbolize, you guessed it, unity.

You might also have been to a Jewish ceremony, which has a chuppah (Hebrew: “canopy”), a sheet, held up by four poles, that’s spread over the couple when they get married. It symbolizes the home they’ll build together. A Jewish couple would also then sign a ketubah (Hebrew: “written thing”) outlining the responsibilities of the groom toward the bride.

 

Hopefully, if nothing else, this article can show potential brides, grooms, and payers of the wedding expenses that there are abundant options available to them, whether or not some would be particularly advisable/accessible in your locale, or defray the costs versus the norm even if they were.

So, cheers, everyone. Keep on marrying and giving in marriage. I’ll see you next week.

birth

First-time parents go through 8-stage life cycle

Stage I: Childless Parenting Expert

You don’t have kids of your own, but you are an expert on how other people should raise theirs.

You give advice to your friends on how to get their kids to sleep through the night or cure their colic. You sit in smug judgment of moms whose kids are screaming bloody murder in aisle 6.

You determine with conviction that you will only breast-feed. Or you know that you will exclusively bottle-feed. You will never use television as a babysitter.

You will never co-sleep. Or you will co-sleep until your kids are teenagers, if that’s what they want.

You will spank your kids, dammit, because that’s what our parents did and look how good we turned out! Or, you vow never to spank because that’s what our parents did, and despite it, we turned out OK.

You know whether you will use cloth diapers or Pampers®.

You will get an epidural, because — hell’s bells — why wouldn’t you?!?!

You will deliver naturally and peacefully, in a tub at home, with calming music, a capable doula and/or midwife, and a well-prepared and helpful husband.

Your child will be brilliant, of course, because you will read to her every day and spend hours doing enriching activities.

Your child will be well-mannered, polite, capable, and will never interrupt when adults are talking.

 

Stage II: Expecting Parent

After you freak out when you see the blue line, you purchase approximately 493 pregnancy, birth, breast-feeding, and child-rearing books — all of which scare the ever-loving hell out of you.

You are terrified that anything you do, or don’t do, will cause a glitch, mutation, or miscarriage.

You refuse any kind of genetic testing and amniocentesis. (Or maybe you don’t.)

You vow not to Google anything.

You Google, anyway.

Your spouse spends hours talking you off the ledge.

You fill your baby registry with items you will never actually use, but you don’t know that yet, because the books you bought said you need at least 12 of these and so you register for and get them.

When you get to the baby section of the store in which you register, you stare at the wall of bottle-feeding, breast-pumping, and nipple care products and weep.

You buy special laundry detergent, hypoallergenic bed sheets, safety equipment for appliances you’ve never even heard of, and clothes made only of organic cotton.

You research diaper services.

You register for childbirth classes at the hospital.

You close your eyes during the forceps, vacuum, and cesarean section of the movie.

You stop Googling.

No, you don’t.

You get so used to being probed, prodded, and assessed, you don’t even mind it when your doctor has three residents also feel how your cervix is starting to efface.

You kind of like it when people fall all over themselves to make you comfortable.

You hate it when people think they can just touch your protruding belly. Yes, it is wonderful; take your stinking paws off of me, you damned, dirty ape!

Oh, wait — did I just say that out loud? It must be all these hormones.

Seriously, though. Don’t. Effing. Touch. Me.

 

Stage III: Shit’s Gettin’ Real

Your water breaks!

You are in bed watching South Park and, suddenly, a tiny gush and a puddle. You tell your spouse, who immediately starts packing his bag. You say, no, I was just at the doctor today, and it must just be all that gel leaking out. You ask your husband to get you some more pineapple.

He starts yelling at you because you are in labor and must get to the hospital immediately! You get up to pee, tell him you see nothing and are not in pain. He keeps yelling and throwing things that he will never need at the hospital — a can opener, some dryer sheets, a rubber band — into his bag. You keep watching South Park.

Your husband wants to know why aren’t you in the car?!?! You start asking him where in the world is that pineapple?!

You feel another bit of a gush, but you want that pineapple so bad, you ignore it. Finally, you agree to at least call the doctor, and you happily munch pineapple while finishing the South Park episode that you now missed half of.

Twenty-three minutes later, the doctor calls and tells you to go to the hospital. Your husband is smug, but has enough sense not to say I told you so. Fine, you say, but I’m driving.

As you walk into the hospital to check-in, there is no denying that amniotic fluid is actually running down your leg, and you are glad when they make you sit in a wheelchair. You basically “sleep” all night on a hospital bed approximately the size of a park bench, while nurses and doctors — and possibly janitors, for all you know — constantly come and go and peer into your vagina.

The next morning, you don’t even have a cramp, so they put you on a Pitocin® drip, otherwise known by its street name: “torture juice.” Within one hour, you are in severe pain; within five hours, you really do want to kill everyone; within eight hours, you begin puking into a basin while sitting on a birthing ball with your doula holding your hair and rubbing your back.

You look up and say to your husband, “Go get someone now.” He looks relieved to have an excuse to leave the room because he can’t wait to get the hell out of there. Fifty-three hours later (or maybe it’s 32 minutes), the anesthesiologist comes in and actually asks you to stay perfectly still while he injects a three-inch needle directly into your spinal cord. Two minutes later, you relax into a blissful heap, and that’s when you notice all of the blood.

I mean, real blood. Lots and lots of real blood. And it’s yours.

But everyone seems cool about it, so you proceed to the pushing stage, and three hours go by and no kid. The doctor says into your ear that you can go 30 minutes more, but if you can’t get that baby out, they’ll have to do a cesarean.

Oh, my god! you think; you closed your eyes during that part of the movie and look where that got you! How could you have been so stupid?!

Stupid, stupid, stupid.

 

Stage IV: The Delivery

They ask you if you want to watch. You say no.

They don’t even bother asking your husband, because they can tell by the look on his face that he’s already seen more than one human being ever should.

Ba-da-bing, there’s the baby. There might be tears. Everyone’s fine, and you’re off to recovery.

 

Stage V: Recovery

You are shaking so hard from the aftereffects of the epidural that it’s a few minutes before the nurse lets you hold your own child. Then you look into her perfect little face and can’t believe you ever thought you knew what love was.

 

Stage VI: Hospital Stay

You try to get comfortable on your hospital-issued park bench. You can’t.

It’s too hot in your room. The IV site on your hand is starting to swell. You are wearing a huge ice pack/diaper thing, and you are lying in a pool of your own blood. There are pressure boots on your legs that inflate and deflate every 15 minutes so you don’t throw an embolism and die.

Someone comes in every 10 minutes to monitor your vitals, check your blood puddle, and ask if you need pain meds. You do.

After a few days, you are sent home with your new little bundle.

 

Stage VII: Going Home

Wait, what? What did you say? Going home? Alone? No, I know I take the baby, but who will come with me?

No, I don’t mean my husband, I mean someone who knows what’s going on!

This baby is so small!! What if [insert every horrible scenario that can be thought of] happens?!?!

They send you home anyway.

On the ride home, you hover protectively over your offspring while berating every crazy f*@#ing driver on the road. You also tell your husband to quit making the ride so bumpy — this seat belt is killing my incision and, seriously, are you trying to hit every pothole in the road?!

 

Stage VIII: At Home

Fates be praised, you made it home alive! It certainly wasn’t because of your husband’s “expert” driving.

You hobble up the stairs to your glider rocker (where you will spend most of the next six months) and finally look into the face of your very own child in your very own home.

You begin to sob. This is a stranger! You don’t know this person! How will you know what to do? How will you know what she wants? How will you get to know her — she can’t even talk for god’s sake!

You cry harder. You look at your husband and tell him to call Child Protective Services.

What on earth were you thinking? You can’t possibly do this!

Your baby is staring peacefully at you. She doesn’t seem a bit worried. You stop weeping long enough to gaze into her precious face.

Then, suddenly, the mothers of millennia are behind you. Their wisdom is inside you.

You tell your husband to cancel that call to CPS. You can do this. You can parent this perfect, little stranger.

Or, maybe that’s just me.

lost-child

Uncommon sense: Teach kids to talk to strangers

As good and responsible parents, we want our kids to avoid “stranger danger.” We spend lots of time telling them to never talk to strangers. We describe who strangers are: they don’t live in our house, we’ve never been to their house, they don’t know your name, and you don’t know their name. We further augment this with the sage advice to find a police officer if they ever need help.

Well, I don’t know about you, but I’ve seen a cop just about once in never on the few occasions that I needed assistance. (And these were the days way before cell phones!)

You can see the scenario, right? A crowded amusement park in July — parent and child are separated and the kid starts looking for a police officer, who of course cannot be found. In the meantime, someone (a creepy someone) notices that child looking lost and bewildered. The child is now in paralyzed panic mode and begins to cry. In swoops creep-o to “help.” We’ve all seen the news often enough to imagine what happens next.

I am in no way suggesting the world is full of creeps just waiting to nab kids. The world is, in fact, full of well-intentioned adults who would be happy to help your child to safety. But the fact remains that, each year, approximately 58,000 children under the age of 18 are victims of non-family abductions.

So, what is the solution, you ask? The solution is so simple, we can’t believe we hadn’t thought of it earlier: teach your kids to talk to strangers!

Children are very good at identifying safe adults. It is much better for kids to actively identify a safe adult and initiate contact with him or her than to passively wait for an adult to select and approach them. Teaching your kids who is safe and how to approach them are key in keeping kids out of danger.

Start this conversation by asking your kid(s) what they would do if you got separated in a playground or park. My kids said they would yell for me and look for me. I asked if they would leave the park if they didn’t find me; one said no, the other said yes. No is the best answer here, so I told them that staying near the spot where we were separated is the best thing to do, since that’s where I would go first to find them. Then, I said that if I haven’t found you before you start to get really worried, you need to find a safe adult to help you.

Here’s how: A child’s first choice, of course, would be an employee — a park ranger or a vendor, for example. A police officer is an excellent choice, too, but since cops aren’t everywhere, other options are needed. Teach kids to identify these folks when you are out and about. When you’re in a mall, ask your child if he can spot employees and to whom he would go if he needed help. Employers, in general, have some kind of “lost child” policy in place for their employees. And in a place like a mall or an amusement park, they will often summon security to help return lost children to their parents.

If an employee cannot be found, or if you are in an area (like a state park) where there are no identifiable employees, a child’s next best choice is a woman with kids. If there are no women with kids in sight, then third on the list is a woman. If there are no women, then a man with children is a fourth choice. If no men with kids are around, then the child should use all of her instincts to identify a man to help her.

Again, when you are out and about, ask your child to show you who would be a good option to ask for help if he needed it. You will find that kids truly have good instincts if they are encouraged to become aware of them and to trust them.

Seeking help requires a child to know her own name, her parents’ full names, the phone number (cell or home) of her parents, and her home address. For kids who can talk but don’t know or can’t remember some or all of this information, you will need to do a bit more prep work. In this instance, you would want to make sure this information is somewhere on your child and she must be able to produce it to get the help she needs.

You can get a luggage tag with your contact information on it and have your child wear it on a lanyard (like a necklace) under his shirt. Or, you could get a hospital-type wristband or other hard-to-remove tag and attach it to your child or his clothing. He should be taught to produce this when he asks for help, so you can easily be found.

Now that your child can identify a safe stranger, it’s time to teach them what to say. The best thing to say is the most concise thing to say: “My name is ___ and I’m lost. Can you help me?” However, you don’t want the first time your child has to talk to a stranger to be the time when they need help. You want to practice this skill before it is needed. So, at restaurants, have your child order her own food. From time to time, ask your child to get change from an employee, or ask someone what time it is.

Doing so does three things: It helps your child identify safe strangers. It helps your child get comfortable talking to strangers. It empowers your child. And empowered kids are far less likely to ever become victims.

Recommended reading for parents:
Protecting the Gift: Keeping Children and Teenagers Safe (and Parents Sane) by Gavin de Becker

parenting

Why teaching kids not to hit is a bad idea

A few months ago, an eighth grade science teacher in my kids’ school district was arrested on child pornography charges. My children, ages 9 and 6, are still in elementary school, but these events required a[nother] discussion with my kids about predators — including how to protect themselves.

For the most part, in our house we have a “don’t hit” rule. However, this rule applies only to people who actually live in our house. The kids don’t hit each other or their dad or me; we don’t hit the kids or each other. My husband and I discipline our kids, for sure, but never by spanking, slapping, or hitting.

Anyone else is fair game.

Before you start freaking out, please know that my kids are good kids. They display excellent behavior at school, and we find them to be generally pleasant, fun, and decent kids. We have not given the kids license to settle every playground disagreement by force. Since my children have emerged from their toddler years (where every kid operates in a feral zone), they have not hit another child outside our home. (They do sometimes still hit each other, but these occasions are quite rare.) But when it comes to bad guys, all options are on the table.

Unfortunately, it is hard to tell the good guys from the bad. The term “guys” here does, in fact, refer to males. While there are female sexual predators, the vast majority are men. And since 90 percent of all child victims know their offender, that offender could be a teacher, coach, neighbor, family friend, or relative. And all of them seem so nice. Terrifying, I know.

I had to tell my kids what the teacher in our district had been accused of. I had to tell them exactly why those actions were wrong. I had to tell them that I hoped none of the man’s students were his victims, but until the investigation is complete, we won’t really know. I had to tell them that even if some of the students had been victims, they may be too ashamed to tell. I had to tell them that it’s never the kid’s fault if something like this happens. Never. I had to tell them that if an adult tells a kid to keep a secret, or threatens them, or threatens a kid’s family or pets, that the first thing that kid should do is to tell a trusted adult (a parent, for example).

I had to tell them that their bodies are theirs and no one — not me or their dad, not a relative, a teacher, club leader, or cafeteria aide, not our neighbors, or any of our friends or the kids’ friends — should ever touch them in any way that feels creepy, strange, uncomfortable, painful, weird, or bad.

This can be a challenging rule in light of overly affectionate great aunts or other distant family members. Nonetheless, don’t make your kids hug or kiss relatives if they don’t want to. This is one of the first things you can do to show a child that their body really is theirs. Forcing a child to hug or kiss anyone when they don’t want to sends a message that their bodies are theirs … unless and until someone else wants to do something to them. This is a terrible message.

Giving kids control over their own bodies can be a challenge for caring and nurturing moms and dads. Parenting instincts notwithstanding, don’t make a kid dress for your comfort. If it is cold outside and you, yourself, feel cold, don’t force your kid to bundle up if he tells you he is fine. Doing so demonstrates that your child can’t even tell if her own body is comfortable. And if the child can’t tell when her body is comfortable, how will she be able to tell when it’s not? So, let your kid make these basic decisions about their own bodies, please.

I had to tell my kids that if anyone ever touches them in an inappropriate way or asks to be touched, they can and should say no — loudly and plainly. They can and should get away and get to a safe adult immediately and tell us as soon as possible. I had to tell them that if saying no doesn’t work, or if they couldn’t get away, they should yell, scream, kick, bite, claw, and hit. I had to tell them that not only could they do it, but that they should do it. No matter with whom or where — even if it’s at school, or in public, or in a friend’s house, or in our own home. And I told them that if this ever happened, whether they said no or not, or whether they caused a scene or not, or tried and failed to get away or not, that it would never, ever be their fault.

I reiterated this message and reassured them that they could tell me if anything like this ever happened to them — that it would be an adult conversation, just like the one we were having right then. I reaffirmed that I will not freak out, and I will always listen to them. I told them that they have my and their dad’s full support in using whatever force they deem necessary to protect themselves. I told them that they will never get in trouble by me or their dad for protecting themselves, no matter what method they choose. I also told them that, if they get in trouble by anyone else for protecting themselves, I would handle it.

The kids asked some questions, which I answered as best as I could. Then I took a deep breath and hoped that they heard at least some of our discussion in their bones. Since then, I have raised the subject again a time or two in a casual, informal way. I will continue to do so in the future.

Parents spend a lot of time telling kids what not to do. But these “nots” have some exceptions. We, as parents, need to make sure that we give voice to those exceptions and tell kids exactly when it is OK to ignore the “nots” — and how to go about it.

marriage

Taking her husband’s last name … part deux

A few weeks ago, I broached the subject of marital name change from a feminist point of view. I was surprised by how many of you weighed in on the subject, either in the article’s comments section or on various Facebook shares.

That was great, because Curiata.com was created to be a platform for its writers and readers to interact, discuss, and cultivate their opinions and tastes on many different things, from politics to superheros to recipes. There were a lot of excellent points raised in the subsequent discussions, and I wanted to take the opportunity to respond or expand on these thoughts.

First and foremost, one person felt that my column left the reason I decided to change my name unclear. As I said then, the real reason for my article was to highlight that it didn’t matter why I changed my name. The real feminist victory is that I had a choice; I was not forced or coerced to do anything against my will. But it got me thinking about nailing down a more precise answer for why I made the decision I did.

Several other commenters questioned if changing my name was a reflection of a lack of connection to my blood relatives. Some of my own friends have experienced a situation such as this and were happy to adopt their husband’s name for this reason. But for me, it wasn’t a lack of identity, but rather too many identities from which to choose. Let me explain — and no, I do not suffer from multiple personality disorder.

If you look at the surnames of my four grandparents, they are, in no particular order: Goodyear, Kimmel, Zellers, and Reynolds. I am no more or less any one of these names. As a matter of fact, I’ve often been told that I am a younger version of my paternal grandmother (which is odd, because she died when I was only two years old — very little time for her to have a significant impact on my life).

Her last name was originally Kimmel. So because I am similar to her, does that mean that my last name should be Kimmel, because I can identify with her? Maybe so, but in our current setup of naming, we don’t get to choose for ourselves until long after we’ve established an identity. And I inherited my father’s name, who inherited his father’s name, and so on and so forth all the way back to Saxony, Germany, when the original spelling was “Gutjahr.” I can also trace my mother’s family all the way to the 1600s in Ireland.

I don’t suffer from a lack of familial identity, but rather an abundance of it. Before I had finally decided to take my husband’s last name, I watched him trace my ancestry quite diligently. (In fact, I think he was more interested in my roots than I was.) When we linked our family trees, it was a huge patchwork quilt.

My husband is equal parts Hillman and Blackwell, Daley and DeMartine. He didn’t get to choose the surname Hillman, just like I didn’t get to choose the surname Goodyear. But the beauty of society in 2014 is that I do get to choose whether or not to change my name at an important juncture in life — when I begin a new family with my husband.

I would be lying to you if I said I’ve always loved my maiden name, Goodyear. But it’s not because I’m ashamed of or estranged from my parents or other ancestors who bear the name. In middle and high school, I was overweight. It doesn’t take too long or too much creativity for the blimp jokes to start rolling in. Intellectually, I understand that kids will be always be cruel, and I would have been picked on no matter my last name. Nonetheless, my maiden name still carries negative childhood connotations, and I’d rather not pass along this particular demon to my kids.

In fact, that brings me to the more precise reason I did decide to change my name: for the benefit of any future offspring my husband and I may have. I realized that by getting married, we were starting a new, unified family. And that someday, we hope to raise a couple of sensible feminists and/or modern urban gentlemen. I felt it was important to signify to the outside world that we are a team.

To that end, there was a brief moment in time when I toyed with the idea of combining our names to create a new name. The best I could come up with was Hillyear or Goodman. Neither of us was thrilled with either option, and after working so hard to trace our ancestry, it seemed a bit of a waste to start a brand new lineage with us. And since our tradition says that our children will inherit their father’s name, it made sense for me to make that change.

In reality, I understand that there will always be individuals who criticize any decision I make. If I would have kept my maiden name, there would have been individuals who felt that I was being disrespectful and emasculating to my husband. Since I changed my last name, I’m sure there are people who think I am “not feminist enough.”

If we would have opted to combine our last names, there are people who would say that we were being too politically correct, or my personal favorite, they would call us “damn hippies.” Lastly, if Mike would have taken my last name, he would have been mocked mercilessly by some of his male friends and coworkers; I also probably would have been called some interesting names if I had “forced” him into this.

I came to the decision to change my name on my own terms. I’m no longer forced, by law or by society, to take my husband’s name as a sign that I am his property. But not everyone has that level of comfort, and many would be judged cruelly if they make a decision that isn’t popular with the majority.

All of this is a long way of saying: yes, we have come very far in terms of the marital name change. But we still have a long way to go.

marriage

What kind of feminist takes her husband’s name?

When Curiata.com was in its infancy, it became clear to me that the female contributors were outnumbered by the men almost 3 to 1. I resolved to start a feminist column to (hopefully) balance out the testosterone on the site.

The Modern Urban Gentleman and I were having a conversation about my column one night and he said, “You know you are going to have to write a column about your name change, right?” And he’s right.

Up until about a year and a half ago, I had always planned on keeping my maiden name. Intellectually, I knew why women changed their last names in the past, and it wasn’t a symbol of a unified family, but rather a designation of property ownership. Further, it seemed to me that everyone in society expected women to just conform and accept their husband’s last name. It’s just what you do! I, for one, despise that argument for anything in life, and it’s one of the things I used to rail against.

So how did I change my mind, and subsequently my name, after getting married? Honestly, I’m not entirely sure. There was never an “aha!” moment when I suddenly knew why I wanted to change my name.

First off, I should state that I do use a combination of my maiden and married name in the professional world — at least for now. My resume says “Carrie Goodyear Hillman” at the top of the page. Part of this is just for practicality. I worked very hard to build an excellent work reputation as Carrie Goodyear, and I felt that completely changing my name would be like throwing all of that hard work out the window. Am I still the same person with the same work ethic? Absolutely. However, our names are extremely similar to the branding of a product. I felt that I (and those around me) needed a transition period.

But none of this answer the question as to why I changed my name. If anything, it makes the argument for why I should have just kept my maiden name. But here’s the rub: Mike and I are not what I would consider a “traditional” couple, though what we are is becoming increasingly common. We cohabited for three years before getting married, which means that we are either going to be just fine in our marriage or we are destined to get a divorce, depending on which study you read. We don’t strictly adhere to traditional gender roles. This was evident over the weekend where our basement started taking on water worse than anything Noah experienced. Today, we both have painful hands and Drylok caked under our fingernails.

In my mind, marriage wasn’t going to change the dynamic of our relationship too drastically. I mean, we already lived together, a marriage ceremony is largely symbolic and, really, it’s the day-in, day-out of a relationship that determines the couple’s level of commitment, not the marriage ceremony itself. So, to our friends and family, we were already a unit, already a team. They received their Christmas cards from the Goodyear/Hillman household.

But, the thought struck me, how would we convey to the outside world that we were in this together? Yes, I would have my wedding band, but there’s something extremely unifying about sharing a last name.

On the other hand, I’ve had a lot of people ask me why I didn’t hyphenate my last name. It was a purely selfish reason. I didn’t want to have to sign Carrie E. Goodyear-Hillman every single time I swiped my credit card. When I was signing as Carrie E. Goodyear, I would get annoyed by the time I reached the “y.”

There are times when I feel like I have to defend my actions to other feminists. But then I realize that is just silly. We have come a long way in women’s rights, but globally we have a long way to go. The marital name change is no longer a requirement or a demonstration of ownership. I changed my name because I wanted to, and because I felt that it was the best decision for me — and that, my friends, is what feminism is all about.